The implementation of construction projects generally has a predetermined time limit. To achieve the time limit, planning and controlling are necessary. Planning can determine what work needs to be done and when it is done, what resources are needed, and what risks may arise. Clear activity targets can be identified for each activity. The case study in this research is Lettu Imam Building Construction Project in the OPD Office Complex of Pasuruan Regency. This study uses the Critical Path Method (CPM) to determine the work items passed through the critical path and the Project Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) to determine the probability of project success. The results of the analysis using the Critical Path Method are 14 work items that were on the critical path A1 - A2 - A3 - B1 - C1 - C2 - C3 - C4 - C5 - C6 - C7 - C8 - C9 - D1. And the result analysis using Project Evaluation and Review Technique has a project completion probability of 89.43% - 99.37%, with the project implementation duration being 162 - 164 days. Keywords: Critical Path, Critical Path Method, Planning, Probability, Project Evaluation and Review Technique
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.