Prevention and eraducation of corruption case are the strategy which can ' AbstrakPencegahan tindak pidana korupsi merupakan suatu kesatuan strategi yang tidak dapat dipisahkan pelaksanaannya, dan harus dilaksanakan secara sinergis, terintegrasi dan berjalan serempak untuk mencegah munculnya regenerasi koruptor muda dan koruptor baru, sehingga timbul permasalahan bagaimanakah stragtegi pencegahan korupsi yang telah dilakukan oleh Pemerintah dalam rangka menuju Indonesia bersih dan kendala-kendala apakah yang dihadapi dalam rangka melaksanakan stragtegi pencegahan korupsi yang telah dilakukan oleh Pemerintah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis empiris dengan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analitis dan metode analisis bersifat diskriptif kualitatif dan analisis isi. Dari hasil penelitian dapat diketahui bahwa pemerintah telah memiliki strategi pencegahan dan pemberantasan korupsi namun demikian masih ditemukan kendala berupa masih banyak peraturan yang saling tumpang tindih, lemahnya pengawasan terhadap lembaga, aparatur dan unsur-unsur profesi yang berkait dengan penegakan hukum, belum maksimalnya perlindungan pelapor dan saksi.Kata Kunci : korupsi, pencegahan tindak pidana korupsi, budaya hukum.

ReveRsal bURDen of pRoof on CoRRUption in inDonesia Corruption becomes the greatest enemy most countries face including Indonesia. Commitment to eradicate corruption significantly increases yet it would be meaningless if it is not supported by adequate legislation to implement the law effectively. Reversal burden of proof essentially aims to facilitate law enforcers to seek and disclose assets a suspect owns allegedly as corruption crime. The principle of reversal burden of proof was originated from Anglo-Saxon countries and this still applies to certain cases such as bribery-related gratifications as Malaysia and Singapore implement. In Indonesia, provisions on the principle of reversal burden of proof have been long recognized even since 1960 on the first law on corruption crimes. Nevertheless, for more than a half of century, the provision on reversal burden of proof has never been implemented. It occurs since articles which govern the issues barely provide clear regulation. It only mentions the principle yet never issues an implemented regulation to support the principle. In regards to this, the research is aimed at investigating, seeking and analyzing the weaknesses in implementing the principle of reversal burden of proof in corruption crimes recently as well as discussing obstacles in law enforcement.

The performance of advocate simply defined as the effectiveness of the services provided by advocates and efficiency of resources allocated and used to prepare such services. There are several reasons that make the effectiveness of the performance advocate can not be determined as exact. Research that seeks to find and locate the causes of the use of empirical legal research methods with sociological and  economics approach. The indicators of performance can be classified into several types, namely efficiency, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and impact indicators. Based on the results of a study of lawyers, law firm/law office or legal aid organizations in Central Java, a performance indicator has not been implemented fully and consistently. They have not implemented a process-oriented quality management as an end result of legal services. Orientation is still focused on the principle of win-lose in handling criminal cases, and management principles are ignored. Transparency as a precondition for performance measurement is also difficult to obtain. This happens because the oversight of the work of da n their performance is still very weak. Keywords: advocate, performance, legal services, legal aid

Nowadays, Indonesia has high number of narcotics users. It includes narcotics abuse inside Keywords: prevention, narcotics, Correctional Institution AbstrakIndonesia saat ini menjadi negara dengan pemakai narkotika yang sangat tinggi. termasuk penyalahgunaan narkotika yang terjadi di dalam lembaga pemasyarakatan. Penelitian ini membahas mengenai apakah kebijakan penegakan hukum dalam pemberantasan narkotika di kalangan narapidana sudah efektif dan kendala-kendala apa yang dihadapi BNN dalam melakukan penegakan hukum pemberantasan narkotika di kalangan narapidana. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode yuridis empiris dengan spesifikasi penelitian bersifat deskriptif analitis. Narasumber dalam penelitian ini adalah BNN Propinsi Jawa Tengah dan Lapas Narkoba Jawa Tengah. Analisis penelitian ini menggunakan diskriptif kualitatif dan analisis isi dengan menggunakan penafsiran hukum, asas asas hukum dan teori-teori hukum. penelitian ini mempergunakan metode analisis Penelitian dan Pengembangan (Research and Developmen/R&D dan Teori Faktor-faktor penegakan Hukum dari Soerjono Soekanto. Penanggulangan pemakaian narkoba oleh BNN didalam Lapas masih belum maksimal karena muncul hambatan berupa kurangnya jumlah pegawai lapas untuk mengawasi warga binaan.

Restorative justice is a pattern of dispute resolution which emphasizes the responsibility of the perpetrator for the consequences of his actions while at the same time paying attention to the position of the victim. This is not simply about punishing the offender; it is about obtaining justice through discussion outside of the criminal justice system to ensure the situation can be returned to its prior state. Islamic law offers a concept of restorative justice called islah, which is a technique to resolve conflicts between parties by forgiving one another. Salatiga City, the most tolerant city in Indonesia, is where this study is being conducted. The idea of restorative justice is used to resolve disputes through the role of a lurah (head of neighborhood), who is responsible for upholding communal order. It is intriguing to investigate whether the reality of restorative justice in Salatiga City can achieve the three main objectives of the law as outlined by Gustav Radburch: justice, benefit, and legal certainty. This study employs a qualitative methodology and a socio-legal research design. Interviews with the offenders, victims, and the lurah who served as the government's mediator resulted in the gathering of data. The findings of this study demonstrate that Salatiga City's restorative justice method to conflict settlement has achieved the goals of justice and legal advantage and can even foster good will among the parties. The absence of lurah's legal standing in the resolution of this issue, however, does not satisfy the requirement of legal clarity. For Salatiga City residents, a legal foundation is required for restorative justice-based legal dispute settlement