OBJECTIVES We evaluated the operative and long-term outcomes of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS This study evaluated 426 consecutive patients who underwent aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection from June 2007 to December 2018 at our centre. Of these, 139 patients underwent total arch replacement with FET (FET group), and 287 underwent other procedures (no FET group). Ninety-two patients in the FET group were matched to 92 patients in the no FET group by using propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS Thirty-day mortality and neurological dysfunction were not significantly different between the FET and no FET groups (1.4% vs 2.4%, P = 0.50 and 5.0% vs 6.3%, P = 0.61, respectively). Long-term survival was better in the FET group than in the no FET group (P = 0.008). Freedom from distal thoracic reintervention was similar in the FET and no FET groups (P = 0.74). In the propensity-matched patients, freedom from aortic-related death was better in the FET group than in the no FET group (P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS Operative outcomes showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. FET contributes to better long-term survival in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

No abstract

Background. The Trifecta valve (Abbott, St Paul, MN) has excellent hemodynamic performance with acceptable rates of freedom from structural valve degeneration. However, some recent studies have reported early Trifecta valve failure. Here, we report a case series of seven Trifecta valve failures with a review of the literature. Methods. Of 107 implantations of Trifecta bioprostheses between 2012 and 2014, we encountered seven Trifecta valve failures (6.5%). Failure of a 19-mm Trifecta valve occurred in 1 patient, failure of a 21-mm Trifecta valve occurred in 5 patients, and failure of a 23-mm Trifecta valve occurred in 1 patient. The mean duration of valve durability was 51 ± 16 months. The mean effective orifice area index on the first echocardiogram after Trifecta valve implantation was 0.96 ± 0.26. The mode of presentation was prosthetic valve stenosis in 3 patients and severe aortic regurgitation in 4 patients.

Competitive flow can be efficiently avoided by appropriate graft arrangement and patients' selection. Selection of the target of the graft end would be crucial to achieve antegrade bypass flow and long-term patency of entire sequential bypass grafts. For the composite graft, functional recovery of the occluded graft would be extremely rare.

No abstract