Purpose To improve diagnosis of hippocampal sclerosis (HS) in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) by using MR fingerprinting and compare with visual assessment of T1- and T2-weighted MR images. Materials and Methods For this prospective study performed between April and November 2016, T1 and T2 maps were obtained and tissue segmentation performed in consecutive patients with drug-resistant MTLE with unilateral or bilateral HS. T1 and T2 maps were compared between 33 patients with MTLE (23 women and 10 men; mean age, 32.6 years; age range, 16-60 years) and 30 healthy participants (20 women and 10 men; mean age, 28.8 years; age range, 18-40 years). Differences in individual bilateral hippocampi were compared by using a Wilcoxon signed rank test, whereas the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for difference analysis between healthy control participants and patients with MTLE. Results The diagnosis rate (ie, ratio of HS diagnosed on the basis of a 2.5-minute MR fingerprinting examination compared with standard methods: MRI, electroencephalography, and PET) was 32 of 33 (96.9%; 95% confidence interval: 84.9%, 100%), reflecting improved accuracy of diagnosis (P = 1.92 × 10) over routine MR examinations that had a diagnostic rate of 23 of 33 (69.7%; 95% confidence interval: 51.5%, 81.6%). The comparison between atrophic and normal-appearing hippocampus in 33 patients with MTLE and healthy control participants demonstrated that both T1 and T2 values in HS lesions were higher than those of normal hippocampal tissue of healthy participants (T1: 1361 msec ± 85 vs 1249 msec ± 59, respectively; T2: 135 msec ± 15 vs 104 msec ± 9, respectively; P < .0001). Conclusion MR fingerprinting allowed for multiparametric mapping of temporal lobe within 2.5 minutes and helped to identify lesions suspicious for HS in patients with MTLE with improved accuracy.

Purpose:To develop a fast, sub-millimeter 3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) technique for whole-brain quantitative scans. Methods: An acquisition trajectory based on multi-axis spiral projection imaging (maSPI) was implemented for 3D MRF with steady-state precession and slab excitation. By appropriately assigning the in-plane and through-plane rotations of spiral interleaves in a novel acquisition scheme, an maSPI-based acquisition was implemented, and the total acquisition time was reduced by up to a factor of 8 compared to stack-of-spiral (SOS)-based acquisition. A sliding-window method was also used to further reduce the required number of time points for a faster acquisition. The experiments were conducted both on a phantom and in vivo. Results:The results from the phantom measurements with the proposed and gold standard methods were consistent with a good linear correlation and an R 2 value approaching 0.99. The in vivo experiments achieved whole-brain parametric maps with isotropic resolutions of 1 mm and 0.8 mm in 5.0 and 6.0 min, respectively, with potential for further acceleration. An in vivo experiment with intentionally moving subjects demonstrated that the maSPI scheme largely outperforms the SOS scheme in terms of robustness to head motion. Conclusion: 3D MRF with an maSPI acquisition scheme enables fast and robust scans for high-resolution parametric mapping. K E Y W O R D S 3D, MR fingerprinting, spiral projection trajectory 290 | CAO et Al. ORCID Congyu Liaohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2270-276X

No abstract

As the multi-center studies with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI) have been more and more applied to neuropsychiatric studies, both intra- and inter-scanner reliability of RS-fMRI are becoming increasingly important. The amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF), regional homogeneity (ReHo), and degree centrality (DC) are 3 main RS-fMRI metrics in a way of voxel-wise whole-brain (VWWB) analysis. Although the intra-scanner reliability (i.e., test-retest reliability) of these metrics has been widely investigated, few studies has investigated their inter-scanner reliability. In the current study, 21 healthy young subjects were enrolled and scanned with blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) RS-fMRI in 3 visits (V1 – V3), with V1 and V2 scanned on a GE MR750 scanner and V3 on a Siemens Prisma. RS-fMRI data were collected under two conditions, eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC), each lasting 8 minutes. We firstly evaluated the intra- and inter-scanner reliability of ALFF, ReHo, and DC. Secondly, we measured systematic difference between two scanning visits of the same scanner as well as between two scanners. Thirdly, to account for the potential difference of intra- and inter-scanner local magnetic field inhomogeneity, we measured the difference of relative BOLD signal intensity to the mean BOLD signal intensity of the whole brain between each pair of visits. Last, we used percent amplitude of fluctuation (PerAF) to correct the difference induced by relative BOLD signal intensity. The inter-scanner reliability was much worse than intra-scanner reliability; Among the VWWB metrics, DC showed the worst (both for intra-scanner and inter-scanner comparisons). PerAF showed similar intra-scanner reliability with ALFF and the best reliability among all the 4 metrics. PerAF reduced the influence of BOLD signal intensity and hence increase the inter-scanner reliability of ALFF. For multi-center studies, inter-scanner reliability should be taken into account.

Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is proving to be an effective tool for mapping the long-range functional connections of the brain in both health and disease. One of the primary measures of connectivity is the correlation between the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) time series observed in different brain regions. The computation of the correlation is often dominated by the presence of a strong global component that can introduce significant variability across functional connectivity maps acquired from different experimental scans or subjects. To address this issue, a variety of global signal correction methods have been proposed, but there is currently a lack of a clear consensus on the best approach to use. Furthermore, there has been concern that some global signal correction methods, such as global signal regression, may produce significant negative bias in the correlation values. In this paper we introduce a framework for visualizing the signal structure of resting-state fMRI data and characterizing the properties of the global signal. Using this framework, we demonstrate that a portion of the global signal can be viewed as an additive confound that increases with the mean BOLD amplitude. An approach for minimizing the contribution of this additive confound is presented, and an initial comparison with existing global signal correction methods is provided.