Juvenile gangrenous vasculitis of the scrotum is a rare entity, of which to our knowledge we describe the first documented case in the UK. It follows a typical disease course, demonstrated by an 18-year-old male who presented with three necrotic scrotal lesions; proceeded by 3 days of fever, pharyngitis and lethargy. Previous cases have been managed successfully with systemic steroids. On this occasion, surgical debridement was made of the necrotic areas under antibiotic cover and complete resolution was achieved with excellent wound healing and no evidence of recurrence. This case report discusses the importance of disease recognition and the merits of surgical management. We also add to the debate as to whether this disease is a variation of pyoderma gangrenosum or a distinct entity itself within the pantheon of scrotal gangrene.

No abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare Likert scores with radical prostatectomy specimens. Methods: This study examined 443 men with validated pre-biopsy magnetic resonance imaging results and used cross-tabulation and chi-square significance testing with National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk categories. Results: The mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 10, and the mean age was 64 years. Comparing Likert III to Likert V and Likert IV to Likert V, both (each p=0.02) were significantly associated with higher prostate cancer risk groups, but Likert III versus Likert IV was not ( p=0.1). Within the subgroup PSA density (PSAD) <0.15 ( n=140), the correlation of Likert score and final pathological risk group was lost ( p=0.5), but it was not lost within the subgroup PSAD >0.15 ( n=281; p=0.045 III vs. IV only and p=0.055 overall). Within the subgroup age <60 ( n=104), the correlation of Likert score and final pathological risk group was significant ( p=0.006 for III vs. IV and p=0.04 overall), whereas within the subgroup age >60 ( n=339) this significant difference was lost ( p=0.34). Further subgroup analysis within Likert III ( n=86) found that men <60 ( n=22) had neither high-grade (G3 or G4 or G5) nor very high-risk disease. There were only two high-risk cases, both of which were G2T3a (2/22; 10%). In men with Likert III and PSAD <0.15 ( n=31), there were seven high-risk and two very high-risk cases (9/31; 25%). This difference was not significant ( p=0.31) Conclusion: With these two findings, we recommend that men <60 with Likert III can be counselled like men with Likert III and PSAD <0.15, that they are unlikely to have unfavourable or high-risk disease and that they may wish to avoid biopsy or treatment. Level of evidence: Level 1b.