No abstract

It is generally accepted that maternal recognition of paternally derived fetal antigens occurs during normal pregnancy and may be beneficial for implantation and maintenance of gestation. Thus, we have investigated the human leukocyte class II DR antigens (HLA-DR), whose role in self and non-self recognition is well known, in women with pre-eclampsia, their partners and in control couples. The HLA-DR antigens were tested in 70 pre-eclamptic primigravidae women and their partners and 70 healthy control couples using the serological Terasaki technique. Our results did not show any particular HLA-DR antigen to be correlated with pre-eclampsia, but a statistically significant increase of only one identifiable HLA-DR antigen, which was presumed to express homozygosity at the HLA-DR locus, in the pre-eclamptic women and their partners: 67.1 versus 7. 9% in the control couples (P < 0.000001). The analysis of HLA-DR compatibility between pre-eclamptic women and their partners showed a statistically highly significant increase of the female-to-male compatibility (P = 0.0003) and a lower but significant male-to-female compatibility in comparison with controls (P = 0.014). From our results, it emerges that HLA-DR homozygosity and reduced antigenic disparity seem to be associated to a major risk for pre-eclampsia, which consequently appears to be a 'couple's disease'.

We studied PRL, FSH, and LH response to LRH in 82 anovulatory and 4 normally ovulating women. Ten anovulatory patients who were basally hyperprolactinemic showed no significant change in PRL concentration after LRH. Of the remaining 72 anovulatory patients with basal PRL levels in the normal range, 59 showed no PRL modification after LRH (as in normals) whereas in 13 patients, a prompt and significant rise of PRL concentration above basal levels in response to LRH was observed. In these 13 patients, the basal PRL levels were significantly higher than those of the other 59 normoprolactinemic women. No significant differences in gonadotropin concentrations were detected among the three groups. The unusual rise in PRL levels after LRH in these 13 patients can be interpreted as a paradoxical response of the pituitary to a specific stimulus, as seen in other clinical conditions. It is suggested that this phasic hyperprolactinemia might represent an intermediate phase between true normoprolactinemia and chronic hyperprolactinemia.

No abstract

No abstract