No abstract

В. Н. Гуреев, Н. А. Мазов Институт нефтегазовой геологии и геофизики им. А. А. Трофимука СО РАН ГПНТБ СО РАН И. Г. Лакизо ГПНТБ СО РАН Критерии авторства и проблема его атрибуции в научных публикациях Усложнение научных исследований, появление новых областей на стыках различных дисциплин, расширение международного сотрудничества способствуют росту числа авторов в расчёте на научную публикацию, а также увеличению числа соавторов. Это ведёт к проблеме атрибуции авторства, требующей разработки новых подходов к выявлению авторских ролей и формированию новых критериев авторства. Решение проблемы атрибуции авторства призвано установить действительный вклад учёного в подготовку исследования и статьи по его результатам, разграничить зоны ответственности соавторов, позволить отдельным учёным накапливать собственный репутационный капитал. В статье представлен обзор отечественных и зарубежных подходов к решению обозначенной проблемы, включая формирование новых разделов публикаций для указания лиц, не соответствующих критериям авторства, и разработку моделей упорядочения имён авторов. Прослежены основные этапы формирования критериев авторства, отражены преимущества и недостатки модели авторства посредством противопоставления новой модели описания видов участия в научном исследовании. Перспективным представляется переход к фракционному учёту вклада каждого из создателей научного произведения, при котором возрастает значение позиции авторов в авторской строке и усиливается роль разделов публикации с конкретным описанием авторского вклада. Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научного проекта 19-011-00534. Ключевые слова: авторство, соавторство, авторский вклад, критерии авторства, атрибуция авторства, недобросовестное авторство. Науч. и техн. б-ки, 2019, № 12 6 SCIENTOMETRICS. BIBLIOMETRICS UDC 808.1 A complication of academic research, the emergence of new subject areas at the intersection of different scientific disciplines, increase in international collaboration are accompanied by an increase in the number of co-authors resulting in the problem of author attribution requiring the development of new approaches to detecting authors' roles and formation of new authorship criteria. The solution of the problem of authorship attribution should specify actual contribution of the scientist to preparing research and the paper, distinguish areas of responsibility of coauthors, and enable certain researchers to accumulate their own reputation capital. The current study presents a review of Russian and foreign approaches for solving this problem including the development of new sections in articles for naming persons who do not match authorship criteria and introduction of models of sequence order of authors. The paper also traces the main stages in the development of authorship criteria, describes the advantages and disadvantages of authorship model as compared to new contributorship model. Transition to the fractional calculation of the contribution of each participant of a research paper is believed to be p...

Academic libraries in the region are organized according to the territorial and departmental principles as components of variously directed in their activities scientific centers of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS). In the context of transformation of institutional management system, it is important to proceed with information and methodical support, rendered by SPSL SB RAS to SB RAS libraries. Besides, information support of educational and scientific interests of scholars and specialists needs higher level of integration of resources and service technologies for academic, university and regional scientific libraries, and this direction requires comprehension on the part of the library community.

The society development depends directly on the state and evolution of scientific environment, its organizational structures. Academic libraries play the leading role in academic communications, performing functions of informational centers, expanding significantly the field of researchers’ information activity and informational security. Libraries of the Russian Academy of Sciences experienced several stages in their development in 1992-2016, which was defined both by socio-political, socio-economic, legal transformations, and changes in the organizational-administrative model to manage scientific institutions in the country. The development of the library fund of scientific institutions passes several stages: · 1990s - stocks are formed mainly with traditional resources; · early 2000s - stocks structure includes remote access license resources along with traditional carriers; and open access resources - into the servicing system. The authors revealed main trends of stocks development based on results of a brief analysis of the library stocks formation of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS) in 1992-2016: the united fund created in previous decades breaks up into elements, is atomized, centripetal tendencies are replaced by centrifugal ones, the model of centralization changes, books’ share in the collection of traditional paper editions raises in stocks; it is observed a transition from the acquisition of printed versions of periodicals and special kinds of literature (standards, descriptions of inventions, etc.) to promoting their remote access; SB RAS’ resource base includes licensed electronic resources of remote temporary access and various types of open access scientific information to meet needs of scientists and specialists.