Surfactant replacement is an effective treatment for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. (RDS). As widespread use of surfactant is becoming a reality, it is important to assess the economic implications of this new form of therapy. A comparison study was carried out at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of Northwest Armed Forces Hospital, Saudi Arabia. Among 75 infants who received surfactant for RDS and similar number who were managed during time period just before the surfactant was available, but by set criteria would have made them eligible for surfactant. All other management modalities except surfactant were the same for all these babies. Based on the intensity of monitoring and nursing care required by the baby, the level of care was divided as: Level IIIA, IIIB, Level II, Level I. The cost per day per bed for each level was calculated, taking into account the use of hospital immovable equipment, personal salaries of nursing, medical, ancillary staff, overheads and maintenance, depreciation and replacement costs. Medications used, procedures done, TPN, oxygen, were all added to individual patient's total expenditure. 75 infants in the Surfactant group had 62 survivors. They spent a total of 4300 days in hospital. (av 69.35) Out of which 970 d (av 15.65 per patient) were ventilated days. There were 56 survivors in the non-surfactant group of 75. They had spent a total of 5023 days in the hospital (av 89.69/patient) out of which 1490 were ventilated days (av 26.60 d). Including the cost of surfactant (two doses), cost of hospital stay for each infant taking the average figures of stay would be SR 118, 009.75 per surfactant treated baby and SR 164, 070.70 per non-surfactant treated baby. The difference of 46,061 SR is 39.03% more in non-surfactant group. One Saudi rial = 8 Rs (approx at the time study was carried out.) Medical care cost varies from place to place. However, it is definitely cost-effective where surfactant is concerned. Quality adjusted life years (QALY) for NICU care compares favourably with cost per QALY of several forms of adult health interventions. Audit, both medical and financial, of these services, at regular intervals is essential.

We report three sisters showing the clinical features and investigational findings of Cockayne syndrome (CS). In the rehabilitation unit of Northwest Armed Forces Hospital (N.W.A.F.H.), Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, there was a 12-year-old girl with typical features of CS. The girl had no apparent problems until the end of the first year when growth and developmental delay prompted medical evaluation. Brain CT, bone X-rays, auditory and ophthalmological evaluation confirmed the clinical impression of Cockayne syndrome. Two of her 13 sibs, both sisters, were later found to have the same syndrome. The sisters varied in clinical severity, as two of them had cataracts and early global delay and died early of inanition and infection. The third showed the disease manifestations at a relatively later age, did not have cataract, exhibited milder manifestations of the disease, and remains alive. The parents are not related by any way and the father is married to two other wives with 11 unaffected children. This report documents variable degrees of manifestations in sibs who presumably have the same gene mutation.

No abstract

No abstract