This paper presents our contribution to the SemEval-2015 Task 7. The task was subdivided into three subtasks that consisted of automatically identifying the time period when a piece of news was written (1,2) as well as automatically determining whether a specific phrase in a sentence is relevant or not for a given period of time (3). Our system tackles the resolution of all three subtasks. With this purpose in mind multiple approaches are undertaken that use resources such as Wikipedia or Google NGrams. Final results are obtained by combining the output from all approaches. The texts used for the task are written in English and range from the years 1700 to 2000.

Studies on the grammaticalization of body-part nouns into reflexives have often formulated cross-linguistic generalizations, but have mostly failed to provide detailed analyses of similar developments attested in unrelated languages. As a consequence, valuable insights have sometimes been overlooked. The purpose of this paper is twofold: on the one hand, it identifies a higher number of languages using “head”-reflexives than previous accounts. On the other hand, its purpose is to analyze the diachronic evolution of nouns denoting “head” into reflexive markers in three unrelated language groups (Basque, Berber and Kartvelian) and to show how “head”-reflexives synchronically and diachronically interact with secondary reflexivization strategies, such as detransitivization. The results suggest that the areal factor has a considerable impact on the emergence of “head”-reflexives; they also show that none of the languages analyzed reflects all grammaticalization stages put forward in the literature. Accordingly, it is argued that the grammaticalization stages are optional, and that the correlation between formal and semantic change is not obligatory.

In this article the authors first of all show the positions in which aspiration can appear within the word in Basque. Hereafter they explain which restrictions this sound is subject to and, after touching on the views of the few linguists for whom aspiration is not etymological and considering its non-random character as established, they make a list of the sources aspiration comes from. Subsequently they discuss its loss and consider to what extent the major Alavese toponymy, which is rich in hs, agrees or disagrees with the current data and with the various authors’ claims. A number of historical toponyms from Gipuzkoa and La Rioja that bear the grapheme <h> are likewise taken into consideration. Finally, as a conclusion, the possibility is referred to of encompassing most of the developments that converge in aspiration in Basque into one and only phenomenon, as well as pointing out the importance of the use of onomastic, dialectal and typological data for the study of our language.

This article investigates word order changes in negated periphrastic constructions in the history of Basque. A number of linguistic variables are argued to correlate with these changes: the negative particle ez is increasingly focalized in main clauses, the innovative pattern negative particle – auxiliary verb – main verb allows for more syntactic flexibility than the conservative one, and the word order changes do not progress at equal rates in all clause subtypes. Genre issues are also considered, including the hypothesis that the loss of the conservative order main verb – negative particle – auxiliary verb of main clauses occurs first in texts close to oral language. Moreover, it is argued that eastern dialects are more innovative than western dialects and that efforts towards standardization of the language have slowed down this case of word order change.

Lan honen helburua euskarazko ezezko perpausetako aditz nagusiak eta laguntzaileak historian zehar izan duten hurrenkera aztertzea da. Hizkuntzaren historiako hainbat testuren hitz-hurrenkerari begiratuz, aditz nagusia - ezezkoaren marka - aditz laguntzailea ordena (ikusi ez zuen modukoa) perpaus nagusietan desagertzen eta mendekoetan gordetzen dela erakusten da, eta, aldi berean, desberdintasun horri azalpen tipologikoa emateko saioa egiten da. Ezeztapenaren hurrenkerari eragiten dioten zenbait faktoreren inguruan ere (perpaus mota, euskalkia etab.) hausnarketa egiten da.