No abstract

Background The objective of this study is to describe the use of targeted therapies for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and overall survival (OS) among patients in clinical practice in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Methods A retrospective cohort of 286 patients from 24 VHA Medical Centers diagnosed with advanced clear cell RCC between Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 and FY2014 was followed through September 30, 2016. Among patients who received targeted therapy, we described the medications taken, duration of therapy, and overall survival. We also assessed the effect of the first therapy received on overall survival using Cox Proportional Hazards models. Results There were 66 patients who did not receive therapy for their advanced RCC. Of the 220 treated patients, the mean (sd) number of medications received was 1.9 (1.1). The medications most commonly used first were sunitinib (61.8%), pazopanib (17.3%), and temsirolimus (10.9%). The median duration of first‐line therapy was 86 days (interquartile range [IQR] 42, 210). Median total duration of therapy was 159 days (IQR 58, 397). 62.3% of patients had ≥ 1 dose of therapy held or reduced, mainly due to an adverse drug event (ADE). Median survival from the start of treatment to death was 1.08 years (IQR 0.80, 1.31). Finally, receipt of temsirolimus vs sunitinib (HR 1.95 [95%CI 1.09,3.47]) as the first targeted therapy was independently associated with an increased hazard of death. Conclusion Our analysis of targeted therapies for advanced RCC in VHA suggests duration of treatment is shorter in a real‐world setting than in clinical trials, and dose reductions and ADEs are more common.

No abstract

Background Increased access to interprofessional palliative care is needed in ambulatory oncology settings. To achieve this, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute launched a collaborative drug therapy management clinic, PharmPAL, where credentialed advanced practice pharmacists lead independent patient visits. Methods As part of a pilot project focused on clinical innovation, we analyzed PharmPAL referrals and pharmacist interventions between July 2020 and June 2021. We extracted referral patterns, patient hospitalizations, and deaths from the electronic medical record. Outpatient palliative care clinicians completed a survey to determine pharmacist needs and overall satisfaction with PharmPAL. Results From July 2020 to June 2021, PharmPAL constituted 4.7% (299/6305) of all outpatient palliative care encounters. Most palliative care clinicians (86% [6/7]) reported a desire to increase PharmPAL availability. No patient hospitalizations or deaths were attributed to PharmPAL visits. Conclusion PharmPAL increased access to palliative care services. All clinicians reported satisfaction with PharmPAL. We continue to assess the impact PharmPAL has on clinic operations and provider satisfaction.

No abstract