No abstract

Introduction. Russian spatial development strategy elaborated for the period up to 2025 set new targets for investment and construction sphere of the state. Importance of systematic approach to investment and construction activity (ICA) tasks is determined by the necessity of shifting the centers of regional economic development according to state global prospective advantage demands. Methods of analyzing condition and potential of activity in different regions and economic sectors as well as at diverse stages of project and reproduction cycles do not allow solving the integrated development problem of all investment and construction activity types depriving it of realization possibility of intraindustrial synergetic effects. It presumes elaboration of new methods of structural analysis, scientific and practical importance of which is connected with justification of investment and construction harmonization directions for the purpose of strategically necessary spatial maneuver. Materials and methods. Works of leading scientific schools in the field of construction development, methodological approaches to the justification of analytical instruments and alternative scientific ideas on increasing economic capacity of construction are analyzed. Basing on structuring method of problematic space of construction development, the authors elaborate a new format of structural intraindustrial analysis providing systematic integrity of construction as the basis of practical implementation of modern Russian development trends. Results. Fulfilled analysis revealed restraints in posing tasks of ICA integral development connected with the absence of scientifically justified approaches to structural analysis along with the necessity of comparative analysis criteria elaboration within both national economy sectors and types of activity as well as stages of project and reproductive cycles. Conclusions. Importance of proposals on widening the tasks and modifying the format of ICA structural analysis is determined by the necessity of moving towards integral effect of harmonious industry-specific development with the use of sectoral and typical advantages of construction as well as scientific justification of integral aims and tasks of sectoral management system development.

The paper analyzes modern energy-efficient technologies, both being applied, and only introduced into the application in the construction of high-rise residential buildings. All technologies are systematized by the authors as part of a unified model of "Arrows of Energy-Efficient Technologies", which imply performing energy-saving measures in the design, construction and operation of buildings.

No abstract

Critical deterioration of infrastructure increasingly becomes an obstacle for the development of modern Russia. Large projects in virtually all sectors of the national economy cannot be implemented without accelerating the resource turnover and reducing the delivery time of finished products to the consumer. Meanwhile, infrastructure projects are not only capital-intensive, but also pay back slowly due to objective economic and natural-climatic reasons. In addition, the current stage of the country development is characterized by the inability to achieve growth in budget expenditures for these purposes, which requires the creation of special mechanisms for investing in infrastructure projects. The practice has developed a number of approaches to solving infrastructure issues, such as the public-private partnership in the terms of concession, syndicated lending, etc. Meanwhile, the investment activity of these mechanisms is insufficient for the scale of implementation of demanded projects. The infrastructure mortgage mechanism proposed by the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation may be a solution of this problem. Debatable character of the model of implementation of infrastructure projects using mortgage instruments, the analysis of approaches and points of view of the problem and the ways of its solution allowed the authors suggesting the key measures that make it possible to give the infrastructure mortgage mechanisms a justified character in the operational mode of time.