Pulmonary nodules with intermediate to high risk of malignancy should preferably be diagnosed with image guide minimally invasive diagnostics before treatment. Several technological innovations have been developed to endobronchially navigate to these lesions and obtain tissue for diagnosis. This review addresses these technological advancements in navigation bronchoscopy in three basic steps: navigation, position confirmation and acquisition, with a specific focus on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).For navigation purposes ultrathin bronchoscopy combined with virtual bronchoscopy navigation, electromagnetic navigation and robotic assisted bronchoscopy all achieve good results as a navigation guidance tool, but cannot confirm location or guide biopsy positioning. Diagnostic yield has seen improvement by combining these techniques with a secondary imaging tool like radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS) and fluoroscopy. For confirmation of lesion access, rEBUS provides local detailed ultrasound-imaging and can be used to confirm lesion access in combination with fluoroscopy, measure nodule-contact area length and determine catheter position for sampling. CBCT is the only technology that can provide precise 3D positioning confirmation. When focusing on tissue acquisition, there is often more than 10% difference between reaching the target and getting a diagnosis. This discrepancy is multifactorial and caused by breathing movements, small samples sizes, instrument tip displacements by tool rigidity and tumour inhomogeneity. Yield can be improved by targeting FDG-avid regions, immediate feedback of rapid onsite evaluation, choosing sampling tools with different passive stiffnesses, by increasing the number biopsies taken and (future) catheter modifications like (robotic assisted-) active steering. CBCT with augmented fluoroscopy (CBCT-AF) based navigation bronchoscopy combines navigation guidance with 3D-image confirmation of instrument-in-lesion positioning in one device. CBCT-AF allows for overlaying the lesion and navigation pathway and the possibility to outline trans-parenchymal pathways. It can help guide and verify sampling in 3D in near real-time. Disadvantages are the learning curve, the inherent use of radiation and limited availability/access to hybrid theatres. A mobile C-arm can provide 3D imaging, but lower image quality due to lower power and lower contrast-to-noise ratio is a limiting factor. In conclusion, a multi-modality approach in experienced hands seems the best option for achieving a diagnostic accuracy >85%. Either adequate case selection or detailed 3D imaging are essential to obtain high accuracy. For current and future transbronchial treatments, high-resolution (CBCT) 3D-imaging is essential.