Abstract. The article is devoted to the problem of normative and legal regulation of incentives for workers of the building companies. The company considered is engaged in high-rise construction. The part of the document "Regulations for the incentives of employees of the enterprise" is presented. This document is introduced into the practical activities of the Tyumen enterprise. The presented part of the document regulates the issues of material incentives for employees of the enterprise. The document "Regulations for the incentives of employees of the enterprise" is developed in accordance with the approach proposed by author. The document was developed, after the authors had carried out an analysis of the scheme of incentives at the enterprise.

No abstract

Investment and construction activities are represented by a combination of a multitude of economic entities and economic relations between them. The Institute for Self-Regulation of Entrepreneurial and Professional Activities in Russia is innovative in terms of regulating market relations. However, the number of areas of activity that apply the principles of self-regulation is growing every year. There is a need to decide on the choice of a self-regulatory organization. The urgency of this professional community needs a system of self-regulatory organizations. The system of rating and evaluation of the effectiveness of a self-regulatory organization is necessary both for the participants in self-regulation and for the state. This is an obligatory condition for the interaction of the professional community with the authorities. This study allows to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative indicators that affect the overall efficiency of the activity and the rating of a self-regulatory organization.

This article highlights some issues related to the assessment of land plots for state and municipal needs, taking into account transport costs in the city of Tyumen, in terms of assessing the losses of the owner. It is timely and relevant tostudy the applied aspect of assessing the market value of a land plot in order to justify a compensation payment when withdrawing a land allotment for public needs. The significance of the work lies in obtaining and using results, formulated conclusions and proposals in the practice of calculating the compensation payment.

The article proposes the method for ranking of competing alternatives for selection of the suppliers. The method assumes to take into account such criteria as price, quality, distance to the supplier, terms of payment and conditions for obtaining a material resource in the course of selection of the material resources suppliers. To confirm the effectiveness of the proposed method, a comparative assessment of suppliers’ preferences in the road-building company SibAgro LLC was carried out without considering the application of the method and conversely.