No abstract

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a cornerstone of catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and balloon-based ablation has been recently performed worldwide. The second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) ablation has proven to be highly effective in achieving freedom from paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. However, there are some debatable questions, including the ideal number of freeze cycles. Methods: The AD-Balloon study (Multicenter Study of the Validity of Additional Freeze Cycles for Cryoballoon Ablation) was designed as a prospective, multicenter, and randomized clinical trial for investigation of the optimal strategy of freeze cycles for the CB2 ablation. One hundred and ten consecutive patients (aged 64±11 years) were randomly assigned to 2 groups after achieving a PVI by the CB2 ablation: 3-minute freeze cycles were added to each pulmonary vein (AD group: n=55) or not (non-AD group: n=55). Delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging was also performed 1 to 2 months after the PVI to assess the ablation lesions. Results: The patient characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups. A complete PVI was achieved in all patients. The total number of freeze cycles and durations for all pulmonary veins were significantly shorter in the non-AD group than in the AD group (5.7±1.6 versus 9.1±1.6 cycles, P <0.0001, and 932±244 versus 1483±252 seconds, P <0.0001). The cumulative freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia at 1 year was 87.3% in the AD group and 89.1% in the non-AD group (log-rank test P =0.78). There was no significant difference in the frequency of gaps on the PVI lines in the delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (46% in the AD group versus 36% in the non-AD group; P =0.38). Conclusions: No benefit was found in the patients receiving additional 3-minute freeze cycles after the complete PVI with the CB2 ablation, suggesting that an insurance freeze after achieving a PVI with the CB2 may be unnecessary and time consuming.

Background and PurposeNeuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) have been shown to significantly affect quality of life (QOL). We investigated the impact of safinamide on depression and apathy when administered as an adjunct to levodopa in Japanese patients with PD.MethodsThis was a post-hoc analysis of data from a phase 2/3 clinical study of safinamide in Japanese patients with PD experiencing wearing-off (JapicCTI-153056; https://www.clinicaltrials.jp/cti-user/trial/ShowDirect.jsp?japicId=JapicCTI-153056). Patients received placebo, safinamide 50 mg, or safinamide 100 mg as an adjunct therapy. The endpoints for this analysis were changes from baseline to Week 24 in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I item 3 (depression) and item 4 (apathy) scores and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) “emotional well-being” domain score. Subgroup analyses investigated the relationship between neuropsychologic symptoms and improvements in motor fluctuation and assessed which patient populations might be expected to obtain neuropsychologic benefit from safinamide.ResultsCompared with placebo, safinamide (both doses) significantly improved UPDRS Part I item 3 scores in the overall analysis population, and the 100-mg dose improved UPDRS Part I item 4 scores in the population with apathy at baseline. Changes in the PDQ-39 “emotional well-being” score showed numerical, but not significant, dose-related improvements. Notable reductions in depression were associated with a change in daily ON-time ≥1 h, pain during OFF-time at baseline, and female sex.ConclusionsThe results from this post-hoc analysis of the Japanese phase 2/3 study suggest that safinamide could bring benefits to patients with PD who have mild depression, pain during the OFF phase. In addition, safinamide might provide particular benefits for patients with PD who have mild apathy and female.

No abstract

The non-dopaminergic and dopaminergic actions of safinamide may alleviate pain in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We investigated the efficacy of safinamide for pain when administered as an adjunct to levodopa in Japanese patients with PD. Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of a phase 2/3 clinical study of safinamide in Japanese patients with PD who were experiencing wearing-off. Pain was assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II 'sensory symptoms' item 17, on a scale of 0-4, and the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) 'bodily discomfort' domain score. Subgroup analyses, according to baseline symptoms and concomitant medications, were also performed. Results: Least square (LS) mean changes in the UPDRS item 17 score from baseline to Week 24 in the placebo, safinamide 50-mg and safinamide 100-mg groups during the OFF phase were 0.08, − 0.15 (p = 0.0133 vs placebo) and − 0.18 (p = 0.0054), respectively, and during the ON phase were 0.04, − 0.08 (p = 0.0529) and − 0.08 (p = 0.0505), respectively. Changes from baseline to Week 24 in PDQ-39 'bodily discomfort' scores were not significantly different in safinamide groups vs placebo. The presence of moderate-to-severe bradykinesia or earlymorning dystonia at baseline resulted in numerically greater effect sizes in UPDRS item 17 scores during the OFF phase. Conclusions: Safinamide 50 mg and 100 mg reduced the UPDRS item 17 score in patients with PD, especially during the OFF phase. Patients with moderate-to-severe bradykinesia and early-morning dystonia may benefit from safinamide treatment.