Purpose This study aims to investigate the influence of corporate governance structures of non-bank financial institutions (NBFI) on their profitability. Design/methodology/approach The analysis is performed using data derived from the Bank of Ghana database during a nine-year period, 2006-2014. Correlated panels corrected standard errors model is used to estimate the regression equation. The study uses board size, board independence, gender diversity, CEO duality and tenure and board meetings as proxies for corporate governance. Audit committee size, independence and meetings are used as measures of audit committee activity. The study also uses the return on assets as measures of NBFI profitability. Findings Results of the study show that there exists positive relationship among board size, audit committee size, meetings of the audit committee and profitability. However, board composition, gender diversity, board meetings and audit committee independence show a negative relationship with NBFI performance. From the findings of the study, it is evident that there are mixed results regarding corporate governance mechanisms and profitability of Ghanaian NBFIs. The results imply that the Ghanaian NBFI industry have unique characteristics and may react differently to corporate governance structures. Originality/value The value of this study is in its contribution to the extant literature on corporate governance and profitability of NBFIs.

This paper is aimed at establishing the effect of anti-money laundering regulations on financial sector development across the globe. Using data from 2012 to 2018 across 165 economies across different continents, income levels and regulatory environments, we test a number of complex and related hypotheses. (a) We examine the effect of anti-money laundering regulations on financial sector development. (b) We examine if this effect differs across developing and developed economies. (c) We examine the nonlinearities in the anti-money laundering regulations-financial sector development nexus. We use the Prais-Winsten approach and the panel threshold estimation approaches to test our hypothesized relationships. We find evidence that anti-money laundering regulations generally promote financial sector development; however, this positive effect is concentrated in developing economies. We also find evidence of threshold effects of anti-money laundering regulations for our sample. Consistent with the earlier findings, the positive effect of anti-money laundering regulations on financial development is concentrated in countries below the threshold value of anti-money laundering regulations. These countries are mostly developing countries. Our findings suggest that strengthening antimoney laundering regulations will be beneficial to developing countries.

No abstract

This study seeks to establish the impact of anti-money laundering (AML) regulations on economic growth as well as how AML regulations influence the foreign direct investment (FDI)-growth nexus for 165 economies across the globe. We employ Prais-Winsten and the Hansen (2000) panel threshold regression estimation techniques to test the hypotheses of the study. We use data ranging from 2012 to 2018. We provide evidence that AML regulations generally stimulate growth; however, AML regulations only stimulate growth below the threshold value. Again, although we report that FDI stimulates growth, the growth-enhancing impact of FDI is more pronounced at higher levels of AML regulations.

PurposeThis study examines the influence of anti-money laundering (AML) regulations on the financial development-economic growth nexus around the world.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses data from 165 countries spanning continents, income levels, and regulatory regimes from 2012 to 2018. The Prais–Winsten (1954) and Hansen (2000) panel threshold estimation approaches were used to assess the study's hypothesized relationships.FindingsFinancial development, according to the research, generally stimulates economic growth. However, the authors find evidence of AML regulations' threshold effect on the finance-growth connection, with the impact of finance on growth being positive below the threshold value. Above the threshold, however, the authors observe a negative influence. Further, the authors find that AML regulations have a considerable detrimental impact on the finance-growth nexus over the threshold for developed countries. However, the authors find a positive but insignificant effect of finance on growth below the AML regulations threshold for African countries, while finance positively impacts growth above the AML regulations threshold.Practical implicationsThe findings of the study imply that countries must make conscious efforts to combat the incidence of money laundering by establishing policies to improve financial transparency and standards, promoting public sector transparency and accountability, reducing legal and political risk, and combating bribery and corruption.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature as it is the first attempt to examine the moderating role of AML regulations in the finance-growth nexus. Also, the study examines the threshold effect of how AML regulations impact the finance-growth nexus.