These results support the use of a minimally traumatic procedure for tooth extraction and socket filling with PRF to achieve preservation of hard tissue.

Beside its influence on determinants of bone strength (geometry, microarchitecture), which is likely to be related to a cellular effect, strontium ranelate improves bone tissue quality as evaluated by nanoindentation, increasing elastic modulus, hardness, and dissipated energy in vertebrae of rats treated for 104 wk with daily dose from 0 to 900 mg/kg. Introduction:We previously showed that strontium ranelate treatment improves the mechanical properties of the vertebral body and long bone midshaft in intact rats. The increased energy to failure obtained with strontium ranelate is essentially caused by an increase in plastic energy, suggesting that bone formed during treatment can withstand greater deformation before fracture. In the bone mineral phase, strontium is mainly located in the hydrated shell and could thus potentially influence intrinsic bone tissue quality. Materials and Methods: To study whether strontium ranelate treatment could positively influence intrinsic bone tissue quality (elastic modulus, hardness, and dissipated energy), nanoindentation tests were performed at the level of trabecular nodes and cortex under physiological or dry conditions in vertebrae of rats treated for 104 wk with strontium ranelate at a daily dose of 0, 225, 450, or 900 mg/kg (n ‫ס‬ 12 per group). Ex vivo CT measurements and axial compression tests of adjacent vertebral bodies were also performed. Significance of difference was evaluated using ANOVA. Results: In agreement with previous results, strontium ranelate (900 mg/kg/d) significantly increased versus controls in maximal load (+23%), total energy (+71%), and plastic energy (+143%). At the level of trabecular bone, strontium ranelate treatment resulted in a significant increase in elastic modulus (+15.1%, p < 0.01), hardness (+11.5%, p < 0.05), and dissipated energy (+16.2%, p < 0.001) versus controls in physiological, but not in dry, conditions. The effect was less pronounced in cortex. Conclusions: These results show for the first time a direct action of strontium ranelate on bone tissue quality. Beside its shown influence on classical determinants of bone strength (geometry, microarchitecture), which is likely to be related to a cellular effect, strontium ranelate improves bone tissue quality. This could contribute to the increase in bone strength and thus be involved in the reduction of fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients treated with strontium ranelate.

No abstract

This study confirms that the retentive behavior of SFI-Anchor(®) is not influenced by implant axial inclination even at angulations of up to 60°. The SFI-Anchor(®) may therefore be particularly indicated for clinical situations with marked implant axial discrepancies.

Objectives This in vitro study aimed to compare changes in retentive force due to cyclic dislodging of three novel un‐splinted attachments. Materials and Methods Experimental models simulating a mandibular two‐implant overdenture situation, with implants positioned with various interimplant discrepancies (0°, 20°, 40°, and 60°) were fabricated. Three attachment systems were tested, “N”: a straight or 15°‐angulated stud; “L”: a sole straight stud; and “C”: a straight or individually angulated stud. All models underwent wet testing and were subjected to 10,000 insertion–removal cycles in a universal testing machine. The mean retentive forces were calculated for cycles 10, 100, 1,000, 5,000, and 10,000. Multiple mixed‐effects linear regression models were applied for statistical analyses (⍺ < 0.05). Results “N” demonstrated an increasing retention until 1,000 cycles, which subsequently diminished back to its initial retention at 10,000 cycles, showing no significant loss during the entire experiment. Statistical models demonstrated no effect of implant angulation on retention, except for 60° after 10,000 cycles (p < .05). “L” showed an early peak at 100 cycles and did not significantly lose retentive force before 5,000 cycles. Angulations of 40° or higher were shown to lead to lower retentive forces (0° vs. 40° cycle 5,000: p < .05; 0° vs. 60° cycle 100: p < .05, ≥cycle 1,000: p < .001). “C” showed stable retentive forces with no significant loss only at 10,000 cycles (all angles: p < .001) or 5,000 cycles (0° vs. 60°: p < .05). Conclusions All systems showed retentive forces promising successful clinical use in implant overdentures, even in situations with extremely angulated implants. Specific abutments compensating interimplant angulation maintain retention longer in situations with high axe divergencies.