are members of the Measurement Application and Development (MAD) Group, Health Sciences Research Division at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. D. L. Jones formerly worked in the MAD Group as an employee of Midwest Technical, Inc.

(ORNLER-397) was prepared as part of the Environmental Restoration Program activities. This report was prepared to ensure safety of personnel during operations conducted at the Gunite and Associated Tanks. This work was performed under Work Breakdown Structure 1.4.12.6.1.01.41.12, Activity Data Sheet 3300X, "ORNL Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 1." The report details required health and safety documentation, roles and responsibilities of health and safety personnel, general site hazards, site access requirements, frequency and types of monitoring, site work zones and control measures, decontamination procedures, standard operating procedures, and emergency contingency plans.

Users were asked to rate their satisfaction on a 5-point scale, where a score of 5 indicates a rating of "very satisfied," and a score of 1 indicates a rating of "very dissatisfied." The metrics were agreed on by the Department of Energy (DOE) and OLCF program manager, who defined 3.5/5.0 as satisfactory. Overall ratings for the OLCF were positive, with 96% of users responding that they were satisfied or very satisfied with the OLCF overall. Key indicators from the survey, including overall satisfaction, are shown in Table 1.3. They are summarized and presented by program respondents. The data show that satisfaction among all allocation programs is similar for the four key satisfaction indicators. Table 1.7. Applications in the Center for Accelerated Application Readiness (CAAR) Application Principal investigator CAAR liaison Scientific discipline

Users were asked to rate their satisfaction on a 5-point scale, where a score of 5 indicates a rating of "very satisfied," and a score of 1 indicates a rating of "very dissatisfied." The metrics were agreed on by the US Department of Energy (DOE) and OLCF program manager, who defined 3.5/5.0 as satisfactory. Overall ratings for the OLCF were positive, with 94% of users responding that they were satisfied or very satisfied with the OLCF overall. Key indicators from the survey, including overall satisfaction, are shown in Table 1.3. They are summarized and presented by program respondents. The data show that satisfaction among all allocation programs is similar for the four key satisfaction indicators.