Single-crystal LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 O 2 (NMC532) with a grain size of 2-3 μm was compared to conventional polycrystalline uncoated NMC532 and polycrystalline Al 2 O 3 -coated materials in this work. Studies were made to determine how single crystal NMC532 material with large grain size could be synthesized. Ultra high precision coulometry (UHPC), in-situ gas measurements and isothermal microcalorimetry were used to make comparative studies of the three materials in Li-ion pouch cells. All the diagnostic measurements suggested that the single crystal material should yield Li-ion cells with longer lifetime. Long-term cycling tests verified these predictions and showed that cells with single crystal NMC532 exhibited much better capacity retention than cells with the polycrystalline materials at both 40 • C and 55 • C when tested to an upper cutoff potential of 4.4 V. The reasons for the superior performance of the single crystal cells were explored using thermogravimetric analysis/mass spectrometry experiments on the charged electrode materials. The single crystal materials were extremely resistant to oxygen loss below 100 • C compared to the polycrystalline materials. The major drawback of the single crystal material is its slightly lower specific capacity compared to the polycrystalline materials. However, this may not be an issue for Li-ion cells designed for long lifetime applications. Lithium ion batteries with high energy density, long lifetime and low cost need to be developed for applications in electric vehicles and stationary energy storage. The family of Li(Ni x Mn y Co z )O 2 (x + y + z = 1) (NMC) materials with high nickel and low cobalt are used as positive electrode materials in lithium ion cells.1,2 One simple way to increase the energy density of NMC lithium ion cells is to increase their upper cutoff voltage which gives access to higher specific capacity from the positive electrode.3,4 However, increasing the upper cutoff voltage usually decreases the lifetime of cells due to an acceleration of 'unwanted' parasitic reactions between the electrolyte and the delithiated positive electrode surface at high voltages. Such reactions include oxidation of species found in the electrolyte, transition metal dissolution, etc. [5][6][7] In addition, structural reconstruction of the positive electrode surface can occur which can contribute to impedance growth and capacity loss. 3,4 The by-products of oxidation at the positive electrode can migrate to the negative electrode surface and be reduced there. 8,9 Such reactions can lead to the consumption of lithium ions from the electrolyte, (to maintain charge neutrality in the electrolyte), a reduction in lithium inventory, as well as a thickening of the negative electrode solid electrolyte interface (SEI) which together ultimately cause cell-failure.10,11 These processes are accelerated by higher charging potentials and higher temperatures.Methods such as modification of the positive electrode surface with coatings or dopants 12,13 and/or modification of electr...

Li [Ni 0.42 Mn 0.42 Co 0.16 ]O 2 (NMC442)/graphite pouch cells demonstrate superb performance at high voltage when ethylene carbonate (EC)-free electrolytes, using a solvent mixture that is >95% ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) and between 2 and 5% of an "enabler", are used. The "enablers", required to passivate graphite during formation, can be vinylene carbonate (VC), methylene-ethylene carbonate (MEC), fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) or difluoro ethylene carbonate (DiFEC), among others. In order to optimize the amount of "enabler" added to EMC, gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to track the consumption of "enabler" during the formation step. Storage tests, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), ultrahigh precision coulometry (UHPC), long-term cycling, differential voltage analysis and isothermal microcalorimetry were used to determine the optimum amount of enabler to add to the cells. It was found that the graphite negative electrode cannot be fully passivated when the amount of "enabler" is too low resulting in gas production and capacity fade. Using excess "enabler" can cause large impedance and gas production in most cases. The choice of "enabler" also impacts cell performance. A solvent blend of 5% FEC with 95% EMC (by weight) provides the best combination of properties in NMC442/graphite cells operated to 4.4 V. It is our opinion that the experiments and their interpretation presented here represent a primer for the design of EC-free electrolytes. Lithium-ion batteries (LIB) are now widely used in electrified vehicles and energy storage systems.1 These applications require longer calendar and cycle lifetime as well as higher energy density. In order to increase the energy density of LIB, researchers focus on developing electrode materials with high specific capacity that may involve charging to increased upper cutoff potentials.2,3

The chemical and electrochemical reactions at the positive electrode–electrolyte interface in Li-ion batteries are hugely influential on cycle life and safety. Ni-rich layered transition metal oxides exhibit higher interfacial reactivity than their lower Ni-content analogues, reacting via mechanisms that are poorly understood. Here, we study the pivotal role of the electrolyte solvent, specifically cyclic ethylene carbonate (EC) and linear ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC), in determining the interfacial reactivity at charged LiNi 0.33 Mn 0.33 Co 0.33 O 2 (NMC111) and LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) cathodes by using both single-solvent model electrolytes and the mixed solvents used in commercial cells. While NMC111 exhibits similar parasitic currents with EC-containing and EC-free electrolytes during high voltage holds in NMC/Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 (LTO) cells, this is not the case for NMC811. Online gas analysis reveals that the solvent-dependent reactivity for Ni-rich cathodes is related to the extent of lattice oxygen release and accompanying electrolyte decomposition, which is higher for EC-containing than EC-free electrolytes. Combined findings from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), TEM, solution NMR, ICP, and XPS reveal that the electrolyte solvent has a profound impact on the degradation of the Ni-rich cathode and the electrolyte. Higher lattice oxygen release with EC-containing electrolytes is coupled with higher cathode interfacial impedance, a thicker oxygen-deficient rock-salt surface reconstruction layer, more electrolyte solvent and salt breakdown, and higher amounts of transition metal dissolution. These processes are suppressed in the EC-free electrolyte, highlighting the incompatibility between Ni-rich cathodes and conventional electrolyte solvents. Finally, new mechanistic insights into the chemical oxidation pathways of electrolyte solvents and, critically, the knock-on chemical and electrochemical reactions that further degrade the electrolyte and electrodes curtailing battery lifetime are provided.

Lithium-ion cells produce a considerable amount of gas in their first cycle. If the gases are not removed in a degassing step, most are consumed by the cell over time. This phenomenon has never been investigated explicitly in the literature. In this paper, the evolution and subsequent consumption of gas in typical lithium-ion cells are measured by Archimedes' principle and gas chromatography. It is found that all evolved gases are subsequently consumed to some degree, except for saturated hydrocarbons. The consumption of gas occurs predominantly at the negative electrode, where the gases are reduced to form part of the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI). Changes to the negative electrode SEI upon gas consumption are investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The effect of gas consumption on cell performance is studied with ultra-high precision charging and high voltage storage experiments. It is found that gas consumption does not result in measurable adverse effects to cell performance. Lithium-ion cells can produce a significant amount of gas during the first charge (in the formation cycle), as electrolyte and additives react at the surfaces of the charging electrodes to form passivating films. If lithium-ion cells are packaged in a flexible casing, these gases are normally removed by the manufacturer in a degassing step, to prevent deformation of the cell and to ensure uniform stack pressure on the electrodes. If the degassing step is omitted, a large portion of the gas evolved is consumed over time.1 The reactions that consume gas are presumably prevalent in hard-cased cylindrical cells, such as 18650 s, which are often hermetically sealed before the first charge, and therefore cannot be easily degassed. The reactions that consume gas are presumably less prevalent in pouch-type cells, which are degassed.Several authors have speculated about the fates of gases in lithiumion cells.2-5 There has been no work explicitly dedicated to understanding the phenomenon of gas consumption. There is no consensus as to whether the effects of gas consumption are beneficial or harmful to cell performance. For example, it has been argued by some that the consumption of CO 2 is beneficial to cells, as it reacts to form a passivating film on the negative electrode. 3,4,6 However it has also been argued that the consumption of CO 2 is detrimental to cells, as it may reduce at the negative electrode to form Li 2 C 2 O 4 , which causes continual self-discharge at high voltage. 2It is important for both scientists and manufacturers of lithium-ion cells to understand the causes and the effects of gas consumption. If gas consumption is quick, benign, or even beneficial to cell performance, then the time-consuming degassing step for lithium-ion pouch cells might be skipped. 7 The gases evolved in lithium-ion pouch cells could be left for consumption within the cell, perhaps leaving the pouch cell flat and rigid after several hours if all the gases were consumed. If gas consumption in a cell produces undesirable effects, such...