VEMP presentation differs for some patients diagnosed with VM. The higher rates of abnormal oVEMPs may suggest greater vulnerability within the ascending utricular-ocular pathway in patients with VM.
Aim:To investigate preseason modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS) performance in a collegiate football cohort; to compare scores to an objective mobile balance measurement tool.Materials & methods:Eighty-two athletes completed simultaneous balance testing using mBESS and the King–Devick Balance Test, an objective balance measurement tool. Errors on mBESS and objective measurements in the double-leg, single-leg (SS) and tandem stances were compared.Results:Mean mBESS error score was 7.23 ± 4.65. The SS accounted for 74% of errors and 21% of athletes demonstrated the maximum error score. There was no significant correlation between mBESS score and objective balance score.Conclusion:The high variability and large number of errors in the SS raises concerns over the utility of the SS in identifying suspected concussion.
Because cVEMP amplitude did not typically grow proportionally with muscle contraction level, amplitude normalization did not lead to stable cVEMP amplitudes or asymmetry ratios across varying muscle contraction levels. Until we better understand the relationships between muscle contraction level, surface electromyography (EMG) estimates of muscle contraction level, and cVEMP amplitude, the application of normalization methods to correct cVEMP amplitude appears unjustified.
This article introduces the Consumer Ear Disease Risk Assessment (CEDRA) tool. CEDRA is a brief questionnaire designed to screen for targeted ear diseases. It offers an opportunity for consumers to self-screen for disease before seeking a hearing device and may be used by clinicians to help their patients decide the appropriate path to follow in hearing healthcare. Here we provide highlights of previously published validation in the context of a more thorough description of CEDRA’s development and implementation. CEDRA’s sensitivity and specificity, using a cut-off score of 4 or higher, was 90% and 72%, respectively, relative to neurotologist diagnoses in the initial training sample used to create the scoring algorithm (n = 246). On a smaller independent test sample (n = 61), CEDRA’s sensitivity and specificity were 76% and 80%, respectively. CEDRA has readability levels similar to many other patient-oriented questionnaires in hearing healthcare, and informal reports from pilot CEDRA-providers indicate that the majority of patients can complete it in less than 10 min. As the hearing healthcare landscape changes and provider intercession is no longer mandated, CEDRA provides a measure of safety without creating a barrier to access.
Purpose of reviewThis review aims to summarize the current literature describing vestibular-autonomic interactions and to describe their putative role in various disorders' clinical presentations, including orthostatic dizziness and motion sensitivity.
Recent findingsThe vestibular-autonomic reflexes have long been described as they relate to cardiovascular and respiratory function. Although orthostatic dizziness may be in part related to impaired vestibulo-sympathetic reflex (orthostatic hypotension), there are various conditions that may present similarly. A recent clinical classification aims to improve identification of individuals with hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness so that appropriate recommendations and management can be efficiently addressed. Researchers continue to improve understanding of the underlying vestibular-autonomic reflexes with recent studies noting the insular cortex as a cortical site for vestibular sensation and autonomic integration and modulation. Work has further expanded our understanding of the clinical presentation of abnormal vestibular-autonomic interactions that may occur in various conditions, such as aging, peripheral vestibular hypofunction, traumatic brain injury, and motion sensitivity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.