Vigilance research has found that observers find the task to be unpleasant and mentally demanding (Warm, Finomore, Vidulich, & Funke, 2015). However sustained attention plays a critical role in numerous operational settings where human operators must monitor automated human-machine systems in the event of potential problems. The current study extended the work from Dillard and his colleagues (Dillard, Warm, Funke, Vidulich, Nelson, Eggemeier, et al., 2013) who explored if there are other dimensions that might affect the workload associated with performing a vigilance task. The area that they explored was the temporal context of the vigilance task on its effects on task performance and perceived mental workload. Borrowing from a temporal manipulation procedure developed by Sackett and colleagues (Sackett, Meyvis, Nelson, Converse & Sackett, 2010) in which they manipulated perceived time progression (PTP) of the participant while they performed a cognitive task. Sackett et al., (2010) manipulated the PTP by developing their studies to deceive the participant into thinking the task they were performing was longer or shorter than the actual time. Upon completion of the task, participants filled out questionnaires related to the hedonic and temporal evaluation of the task. Participants that were told the task was longer than they actually participated for (time flies conditions) rated times as flying and the task more as more enjoyable.