No abstract

Background Over the past several years, hyperdilute calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) has emerged as an effective modality for improving skin quality and managing laxity in the face, arms, hands, neck, décolletage, upper arms, abdomen, buttocks, and upper legs, as well as treating cellulite and striae. While undiluted CaHA is used to provide volume, hyperdilute CaHA is distributed across a much larger surface area in a more superficial plane to stimulate neocollagenesis and elastin formation over time. The absence of lymphocytic infiltrates and predominance of type 1 collagen in the tissue response to CaHA make hyperdilute CaHA a valuable tool for nonsurgical skin tightening. Objectives Provide practical step-by-step guidance on patient selection, dilution practices, and optimal injection technique to facilitate incorporation of the technique into clinical practice. Methods Over the course of 3 regional meetings in the United States, 12 expert physician injectors participated in live webinars as part of a continuing medical education program. Results The practical guidance in this manuscript is based upon the most frequently requested information by audience members and the information considered critical for success by the authors. Conclusions The minimally invasive nature of filler injection results in little down time, making this treatment particularly appealing. The recommendations presented are consistent with previously published consensus guidelines on hyperdilute CaHA but are intended to serve as “how-to” guidance from experience of expert injectors who have successfully treated the face and body.

Background: DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI) is a novel botulinum toxin type A formulation in clinical development. A phase 2 dose-ranging study identified an optimal dose and demonstrated efficacy with a median duration of 24 weeks. Methods: In two phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2), subjects with moderate or severe glabellar lines at maximum frown were assigned randomly to receive placebo or 40 U of DAXI. Glabellar lines were evaluated at least every 4 weeks for at least 24 weeks until severity returned to baseline (≤36 weeks). Results: Overall, 609 subjects were enrolled (DAXI, n = 405; placebo, n = 204). DAXI was significantly more effective than placebo in achieving the primary efficacy outcome (≥2-point improvement in glabellar line severity at maximum frown at week 4 according to both investigator and subject ratings): 73.6 percent versus 0.0 percent (SAKURA 1), and 74.0 percent versus 1.0 percent (SAKURA 2) (both p < 0.0001). Composite investigator and subject ratings of maximum frown after DAXI treatment showed that glabellar line severity of none or mild was maintained for a median of 24.0 weeks (SAKURA 1) and 23.9 weeks (SAKURA 2), and glabellar line severity did not return to baseline levels for a median of 27.7 and 26.0 weeks, respectively. DAXI was generally well tolerated, with the most common adverse events related to DAXI treatment being headache (SAKURA 1, 7.0 percent; SAKURA 2, 5.9 percent) and injection-site pain (5.0 percent and 2.4 percent, respectively). Conclusions: Results from both studies were highly consistent. DAXI may offer a prolonged duration of response (median, ≥24 weeks) and is generally well tolerated. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I.

No abstract