Matrix assisted inlet ionization (MAII) is a method in which a matrix:analyte mixture produces mass spectra nearly identical to electrospray ionization without the application of a voltage or the use of a laser as is required in laserspray ionization (LSI), a subset of MAII. In MAII, the sample is introduced by, for example, tapping particles of dried matrix:analyte into the inlet of the mass spectrometer and, therefore, permits the study of conditions pertinent to the formation of multiply charged ions without the need of absorption at a laser wavelength. Crucial for the production of highly charged ions are desolvation conditions to remove matrix molecules from charged matrix: analyte clusters. Important factors affecting desolvation include heat, vacuum, collisions with gases and surfaces, and even radio frequency fields. Other parameters affecting multiply charged ion production is sample preparation, including pH and solvent composition. Here, findings from over 100 compounds found to produce multiply charged analyte ions using MAII with the inlet tube set at 450°C are presented. Of the compounds tested, many have -OH or -NH 2 functionality, but several have neither (e.g., anthracene), nor aromaticity or conjugation. Binary matrices are shown to be applicable for LSI and solvent-free sample preparation can be applied to solubility restricted compounds, and matrix compounds too volatile to allow drying from common solvents. Our findings suggest that the physical properties of the matrix such as its morphology after evaporation of the solvent, its propensity to evaporate/sublime, and its acidity are more important than its structure and functional groups.
We investigate a thermodynamic cycle using a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) with nonlinear interactions as the working medium. Exploiting Feshbach resonances to change the interaction strength of the BEC allows us to produce work by expanding and compressing the gas. To ensure a large power output from this engine these strokes must be performed on a short timescale, however such non-adiabatic strokes can create irreversible work which degrades the engine's efficiency. To combat this, we design a shortcut to adiabaticity which can achieve an adiabatic-like evolution within a finite time, therefore significantly reducing the out-of-equilibrium excitations in the BEC. We investigate the effect of the shortcut to adiabaticity on the efficiency and power output of the engine and show that the tunable nonlinearity strength, modulated by Feshbach resonances, serves as a useful tool to enhance the system's performance.
Natural graphite (NG) negative electrode materials can perform poorly compared to synthetic, or artificial, graphite (AG) negative electrodes in certain lithium ion cells. LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 O 2 (NMC532)/(AG or NG) pouch cells were tested with various loadings of an electrolyte additive blend to study the effect of the graphite type as well as the formed solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Cells underwent testing using ultra-high precision coulometry, isothermal microcalorimetry, in-situ pressure measurements, long term cycling and in-situ gas measurements. In short term experiments NMC532/AG and NMC532/NG cells showed similar coulombic efficiencies, parasitic heat flows, and gas production with large electrolyte additive loadings, but NG cells showed worse capacity retention in long-term tests. With low additive loadings NMC532/NG cells showed lower coulombic efficiency, higher capacity fade, more parasitic heat flow, and more gas production. In-situ cell stack pressure measurements showed that NMC532/NG cells irreversibly expanded during cycling while NMC532/AG cells did not. Although these results lead one to propose a simple model for the poor performance of NMC532/NG cells, NMC622/NG and NMC622/AG cells showed very different behavior in long term tests suggesting that positive/negative interactions play a strong role in governing the behavior of graphites in Li-ion cells. Next generation lithium ion batteries require higher energy density, longer life, better safety, and lower cost to fulfill the ever-increasing demand for electric vehicles and renewable grid-level energy storage. By increasing the energy density of cells while keeping lifetime consistent, one can in turn decrease the cost of Li-ion cells. Much work has been focused on increasing the upper cutoff voltage of cells in order to achieve this increase in energy density. However, increasing the upper cutoff potential increases the rates of unwanted reactions in cells which can compromise lifetime.1-3 These unwanted reactions are commonly termed parasitic reactions.Another way of addressing the issue of cost is to use higher energy density materials, such as natural graphite (NG) as a negative electrode material instead of synthesized graphite, here called artificial graphite (AG). NG is known to perform poorly in some cells, which has in the past been attributed to surface exfoliation and cracking of particles.4-7 Park et al. found spherical natural graphite showed signs of particle swelling and cracking caused by mechanical strain during cycling, which could be suppressed using a carbon coating process. 5Carbon coatings on natural graphite negative electrodes have been studied in the past to avoid exfoliation from propylene carbonatecontaining electrolytes, but these coatings may decrease the energy density.4,6 AG performance reported in the literature appears to outperform natural graphite, however, few direct comparisons of artificial and natural graphite exist in the literature. Lee et al. 8 found that plasma treated AG performed better i...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.