Background Fatigue is a symptom characterized by an elevated prevalence in patients undergoing hemodialysis, which may cause extreme mental and muscular debilitation, significantly influencing social interaction, life quality and well-being. However, the significance of fatigue to patients undergoing hemodialysis has not been recognized yet, and prevention and management of fatigue in this population have not been thoroughly investigated. Additionally, previous studies mainly focused on muscular fatigue, while mental fatigue has been seldom discussed. This study aims to investigate the interaction between nurses and multidisciplinary of nonpharmacological integrated care interventions (NICIs) and assess the impact of fatigue on patients undergoing hemodialysis. Methods The integrative nonpharmacological care interventions in this study included walking, motivational interviewing (MI) and health education regarding behavioral self-management. A single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted in the dialysis center of the nephrological department in a tertiary affiliated hospital of medical university from January to June 2019. A total of 118 patients were selected and randomly divided into the intervention group (IG) and the control group (CG). Four patients dropped out during the study, and 114 patients were enrolled for the eventual analysis. The 60 patients in the IG received routine nursing combined with integrated care interventions, while the 54 patients in the CG received routine nursing only. This study lasted for six months. Results The experimental group exhibited significant reductions of overall fatigue (2.26 vs. 0.48), mental fatigue (1.41 vs. 0.54), muscular fatigue (2.13 vs. 0.75), and some biochemical indicators (e.g., serum urea) (P<0.05), compared with the CG. Conclusions Nurses and multidisciplinary teams have been demonstrated to play a key role and interplay function in chronic disease management. Hence, the nurse-led multidisciplinary NICIs significantly alleviated total fatigue (muscular fatigue and mental fatigue) and improved other parameters. Trial registration ChiCTR-IOR-16008621 (March 18, 2016)

This study was designed to investigate the effects of nonpharmacological integrated care protocols on fatigue in patients with hemodialysis. This parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted on patients undergoing hemodialysis from May to October 2020 at the Dialysis Center of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University. The patients were randomized into an intervention group (accepting nonpharmacological integrated care protocols and standard care) or a control group (accepting standard care only) using a computer-generated random number. The nonpharmacological holistic care intervention used in this study involved a well-rounded multidisciplinary team that worked together to improve dietary compliance, medication adherence, and self-management to improve patients’ care and promote self-management. From the 120 evaluated patients, 116 cases were eligible and analyzed. The results showed that patients from the intervention group had obviously reduced overall fatigue, mental fatigue, and muscular fatigue relative to the control group. The nonpharmacological integrated care protocols were interactive and promotive to each other. Meanwhile, the role and function of nurses in the management of chronic disease were demonstrated to be crucial.

This study investigates the discourse of a long-lasting social debate over the safety of genetically modified food in China. Based on data from the social media platform WeChat, it adopts the perspective of critical discourse analysis to analyze what strategies are used in discourses of Chinese genetically modified foods to construct identities of the two opposing sides in genetically modified debates. The two sides use different rhetorical devices, argumentative strategies, and intertextual historical elements. Specifically, opponents of genetically modified food are inclined to use metaphors, moralization, intertextual proverbs, and revolutionary inflection to legitimize their position, while supporters often use irony, authorization, and historical allusions to legitimate as well as enhance their hegemony. I suggest that exploring how each side strategically constructs a discourse may facilitate better understanding and mitigate conflict between the two polarized viewpoints represented in social media.