Objective The utilization of the prone position to treat patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who are critically ill and mechanically ventilated is well documented. This case series reports the location, severity, and prevalence of focal peripheral nerve injuries involving the upper limb identified in an acute COVID-19 rehabilitation setting. The purpose of this study was to report observations and to explore the challenges in assessing these patients. Methods Participants were patients with suspected peripheral nerve injuries following discharge from COVID-19 critical care who were referred to the peripheral nerve injury multidisciplinary team. The patients studied had suspected peripheral nerve injuries following discharge from COVID-19 critical care and were referred to the peripheral nerve injury multidisciplinary team. Data were collected retrospectively on what peripheral neuropathies were observed, with reference to relevant investigation findings and proning history. Results During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom, 256 patients were admitted to COVID-19 critical care of Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom. From March to June 2020, a total of 114 patients required prone ventilation. In this subgroup, a total of 15 patients were identified with clinical findings of peripheral nerve injuries within the upper limb. In total, 30 anatomical nerve injuries were recorded. The most commonly affected nerve was the ulnar nerve (12/30) followed by the cords of the brachial plexus (10/30). Neuropathic pain and muscle wasting were identified, signifying a high-grade nerve injury. Conclusion Peripheral nerve injuries may be associated with prone positioning on intensive care units, although other mechanisms, such as those of a neuroinflammatory nature, cannot be excluded. Impact Proning-related upper limb peripheral nerve injuries are not discussed widely in the literature and may be an area of further consideration when critical care units review their proning protocols. Physical therapists treating these patients play a key part in the management of this group of patients by optimizing the positioning of patients during proning, making early identification of peripheral nerve injuries, providing rehabilitation interventions, and referring to specialist services if necessary.

ObjectiveTo identify what outcomes have been assessed in traumatic brachial plexus injury (TBPI) research to inform the development of a core outcome set for TBPI.DesignSystematic review.MethodMedline (OVID), EMBASE, CINAHL and AMED were systematically searched for studies evaluating the clinical effectiveness of interventions in adult TBPIs from January 2013 to September 2018 updated in May 2021. Two authors independently screened papers. Outcome reporting bias was assessed. All outcomes were extracted verbatim from studies. Patient-reported outcomes or performance outcome measures were extracted directly from the instrument. Variation in outcome reporting was determined by assessing the number of unique outcomes reported across all included studies. Outcomes were categorised into domains using a prespecified taxonomy.ResultsVerbatim outcomes (n=1491) were extracted from 138 studies including 32 questionnaires. Unique outcomes (n=157) were structured into 4 core areas and 11 domains. Outcomes within the musculoskeletal domain were measured in 86% of studies, physical functioning in 25%, emotional functioning in 25% and adverse events in 33%. We identified 63 different methods for measuring muscle strength, 16 studies for range of movement and 63 studies did not define how they measured movement. More than two-thirds of the outcomes were incompletely reported in prospective studies.ConclusionThis review of outcome reporting in TBPI research demonstrated an impairment focus and heterogeneity. A core outcome set would ensure standardised and relevant outcomes are reported to facilitate future systematic review and meta-analysis.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018109843.

Background Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) can be acquired by patients in intensive care unit (ICU) who are critically unwell with Covid pneumonitis. Prone position ventilation has been linked to this life‐changing complication. Aim To reduce the occurrence and severity of PNIs for patients with Covid pneumonitis requiring prone positioning whilst sedated and ventilated in ICU. Study Design This study is a quality improvement project that evolved over the course of the first two surges of Covid pneumonitis admissions within the ICU at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (Surge 1: March 2020–July 2020, 93 prone ventilation survivors; Surge 2: September 2020–May 2021, 309 prone ventilation survivors). Implementation of updated prone positioning guidelines that aimed to reduce the risk of PNI. This was supplemented by face‐to‐face teaching for ICU professionals. The number of patients who sustained PNI and the severity of such injuries were recorded. Results During the first surge 21 patients (22.6%) had at least one high grade PNI. During the second surge there were 12 patients (3.9%) sustaining an intermediate or high grade PNI. For PNI patients, there was an increase in the mean proning episodes (6–13) and duration (17.8–18.6 h). This represents an 82% reduction in PNI cases. High grade injuries reduced from 14/21 (66%) to 4/12 (33%). Conclusions Optimizing the position of patients in the prone position in ICU with Covid pneumonitis may be key in reducing the development of PNI. Changes to pharmacological management may have influenced the results seen in this study. Relevance to Clinical Practice Clinicians working within ICU with acutely unwell patients with Covid pneumonitis should acknowledge the heightened risk of PNI and take relevant steps to reduce the risk of injury acquisition.