Difference approaches to the study of excited states have undergone a renaissance in recent years, with the development of a plethora of algorithms for locating self-consistent field approximations to excited states. Density functional theory is likely to offer the best balance of cost and accuracy for difference approaches, and yet there has been little investigation of how the parametrization of density functional approximations affects performance. In this work, we aim to explore the role of the global Hartree–Fock exchange parameter in tuning accuracy of different excitation types within the framework of the recently introduced difference projected double-hybrid density functional theory approach and contrast the performance with conventional time-dependent double-hybrid density functional theory. Difference projected double-hybrid density functional theory was demonstrated to give vertical excitation energies with average error and standard deviation with respect to multireference perturbation theory comparable to more expensive linear-response coupled cluster approaches (J. Chem. Phys.2020153074103). However, despite benchmarking of local excitations, there has been no investigation of the methods performance for charge transfer or Rydberg excitations. In this work we report a new benchmark of charge transfer, Rydberg, and local excited state vertical excitation energies and examine how the exact Hartree–Fock exchange affects the benchmark performance to provide a deeper understanding of how projection and nonlocal correlation balance differing sources of error in the ground and excited states.