Eagle syndrome, also known as elongated styloid process, is a condition first described by Watt Eagle in 1937. It occurs when an elongated styloid process or calcified stylohyoid ligament causes recurrent throat pain or foreign body sensation, dysphagia, or facial pain. Additional symptoms may include neck or throat pain with radiation to the ipsilateral ear. It is usually hard to diagnose because the symptoms related to this condition can be confused with those attributed to a wide variety of facial neuralgias. In this article, a case of Eagle syndrome exhibiting unilateral symptoms with bilateral elongation of styloid process is reported.

No abstract

Summary This paper describes the work involving the implementation of a control system aimed at reducing vibrations in a slender footbridge located at FEUP campus. This structure was extensively studied in the past, mainly due to the clear exhibition of very perceptible vibrations induced by pedestrian loads. For that reason, a passive tuned mass damper (TMD) was installed in one of the spans of the structure for research purposes. Because the structure has several critical vibration modes with natural frequencies close to 2 Hz, only one device cannot act efficiently on all of them, which limits the control efficiency. In these cases, the option for a semiactive TMD seems to be appropriate, given the self‐tuning capabilities of these devices and even the possibility of performing multimode control. In this context, this document summarizes the work developed in studying, testing, and installing the passive TMD in the footbridge, as well as its migration to a semiactive system. Taking advantage of a continuous dynamic monitoring system installed in 2009, it was possible to evaluate the vibration levels of the structure measured over the past years, including the periods previous to and after the installation of the control solutions. A tendency was noted in the reduction of the peak accelerations of some sections of the deck after the installation of the passive TMD, which were even more attenuated with the activation of the semiactive system.

Background: Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty has been shown to reduce complications associated with the traditional technique. As an extension of a previously published randomized controlled trial, this study aims to clarify whether preservation of Scarpa fascia during abdominoplasty has an influence on scar quality or sensibility recovery. Methods: This was a single-center clinical trial, involving 160 patients randomly assigned to one of two surgical procedures: classic full abdominoplasty (group A) and abdominoplasty with preservation of Scarpa fascia (group B). Patients were later convoked to assess scar quality and abdominal cutaneous sensibility. Scar quality was evaluated through the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Cutaneous sensibility was measured on the upper and lower abdomen, using light touch, Semmes-Weinstein testing (5.07/10-g monofilament), and a 25-gauge needle. Results: A total of 99 patients (group A, 54 patients; group B, 45 patients) responded to contact, with a mean follow-up time of 44 months. Concerning scar quality, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale scores were similar between groups. On the upper abdomen, there was a statistically significant difference between groups on cutaneous sensibility, on the examination with the Semmes-Weinstein 5.07/10-g monofilament (group A, 79.6 percent; group B, 93.3 percent; p = 0.046) and pain (group A, 90.7 percent; group B, 100 percent; p = 0.044). No statistically significant differences were found between groups on the lower abdomen. A considerable proportion of patients (two-thirds) still presented sensibility alterations in the subumbilical area 3½ years after abdominoplasty. Conclusion: Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty does not influence scar quality, but it improves sensibility recovery in the supraumbilical area. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

When an auricular defect is caused by high-energy trauma that causes damage to the surrounding tissues, the patient may be not a candidate for reconstruction with local flaps and free tissue transfer may be necessary. Here we present a case of total auricular reconstruction in a 27 year-old man who had total loss of the left ear and traumatized temporal skin and fascia. A radial forearm flap prelaminated by a porous polyethylene implant was employed. A "printed" ear made of silicone, based on the patient's CT-scan of the contralateral ear, was used for intraoperative molding of the future reconstruction. Prolonged prelamination time and surgical delay (three months) were performed to reduce edema, distortion and loss of definition of the framework after revascularization. After subsequent integration and neovascularization of the added tissue, the prelaminated flap was transferred. Flap reinnervation was also performed by direct coaption of the great auricular nerve to the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve. The flap fully survived and there were no complications in the early postoperative period. Between 3 and 6 months, the patient returned to normal ranges in terms of warmth and cold, and recovered the discriminative facial sensibility. After one year the auricular reconstruction was intact and satisfactory aesthetic results were achieved. This method may offer a satisfactory solution for a difficult problem and may be considered for acquired total ear defects.