Este trabalho apresenta e exemplifica a aplicação de metodologia que apoia a seleção e a priorização de um conjunto de dados bibliográficos que represente o estado da arte do assunto pesquisado. O processo envolve a formação de uma base de dados preliminar bruta, seguida da aplicação de uma série de etapas de filtro para a formação de uma base de dados convergente com os objetivos da pesquisa e termina com a priorização desses dados através de um método de apoio à decisão (MAD). O método adotado para exemplificar a aplicação da metodologia foi a Composição Probabilística de Preferências (CPP). A metodologia foi aplicada com sucesso à seleção de artigos em diferentes contextos.
There are few works that have attempted to map the global research on sustainability and project management. This research utilizes scientometric review of global sustainability and project management research in 2006–2018, through co-word analysis, co-author analysis, journal analysis, institution analysis, and country analysis. A total of 400 bibliographic records from the Web of Science and Scopus core collection databases were selected and analyzed. The findings reveal an evolution of the research field based on the concepts in the Brundtland Commission report to considering sustainability Triple Bottom Line in project management activities. The purpose of this data article is to provide an understanding of the status quo and the trend for research on sustainability and project management in the world.
Goal: The objective of this research is to provide researchers and project management professionals with a contemporary view of the measurement of project success.
Design/Methodology/Approach: After a dense literature review, a research-based study analyzes the project success criteria perspectives of 264 Brazilian project managers and provides a ranking of the most widely used measures in practice in Brazilian organizations.
Results: The study analyzes contemporary literature on project success criteria and discusses overlaps and trends. One of the important findings of this research is the identification of mismatches between academic perspectives and those of project managers in regard to project success as well as real success criteria used in organizations.
Limitations of the investigation: As the sample covered was comprised exclusively of Brazilian project managers, cross-cultural success criteria research is, therefore, encouraged.
Practical implications: The proposed performance criteria can be used in future research and for professional proposes in success criteria assessment.
Originality/Value: Given the diversity of success criteria measures, authors can have difficulty in finding the one that better fits their needs; alternatively, they can create their own scale. The reliability of several studies can be questioned due to their subjectivity and, in some cases, weakly defined measures. The present study can therefore provide project professionals with guidelines for success assessment that make measuring and comparing different projects possible.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.