Objective  To create and validate a handbook for the prevention of peristomal skin complications. Methods  For the elaboration of the handbook, a literature review was conducted in the following databases: Cochrane Library, SciELO, LILACS, and MEDLINE. The handbook “Preventing and treating the complications of intestinal peristomal skin” was elaborated in nine steps. The first step addressed the concepts of ostomy, stoma type, and ostomy classification. In the second step, the following were described: definition of the collection equipment, type of collection equipment, and technique of changing one- and two-piece equipment. In the third step, the peristomal skin cleansing technique was described. In the fourth step, the types of complications of the peristomal skin were listed. In the fifth step, preventive approaches to avoid complications with the peristomal skin were described. In the sixth step, the therapeutic approaches in the treatment of aforementioned peristomal skin complications were addressed. In the seventh step, the handbook layout was created by an Information Technology professional. In the eighth step, the handbook was validated by 25 nurses. In the ninth step, the final version of the instrument was laid out. Results  The final version of the “Preventing and treating the complications of intestinal peristomal skin” handbook has 37 pages. It was registered in the International Standard Book Number: 978-85-67647-46-3, standard format size (21 cm high by 15 cm wide), totaling 50 illustrations. In the first evaluation, the evaluators assessed the manual as partially adequate to completely adequate. In the first evaluation, the content validity index ranged between 0.88 to 1.0; no 100% agreement was observed among the evaluators' answers. In the second evaluation, as an agreement was observed in all items, the content validity index was 1.0. Conclusion  The handbook “Preventing and treating the complications of intestinal peristomal skin” was elaborated based on scientific principles and had its content, language, and design validated by specialists in the field.

Algoritmos para prevenção e tratamento de lesão por fricçãoAlgorithms for the prevention and treatment of friction injury Algoritmos para prevención y tratamiento de lesión por fricción

Objective: To build and validate algorithms for prevention and treatment of incontinence-associated dermatitis. Method: A methodological study. An integrative review of articles published from 2009 to 2019 was carried out after a literature search in the main Health Sciences databases for the construction of the algorithms. The algorithms were evaluated by 27 nurses using the Delphi technique. The content validity index was used for data analysis. Results: The judges evaluated the algorithms from inadequate to adequate in the first round of consultation, and from adequate to totally adequate in the second round of consultation. The global content validity index was 0.923 in the first consultation and 1.0 in the second consultation. Conclusion: After reviewing the literature, the algorithms were constructed and validated by professionals with experience in the area, reaching agreement among the judges in the second round of consultation.

Aplicativo para enfrentamento da COVID-19 por profissionais de saúde na Atenção DomiciliarApplication for coping with COVID-19 by health professionals in home care Aplicación para enfrentamiento del COVID-19 por profesionales de la salud en la atención domiciliaria

Objetivo: Construir e validar algoritmos para a prevenção e o tratamento da dermatite associada à incontinência. Método: Estudo metodológico. Para o desenvolvimento dos algoritmos, foi realizada revisão integrativa de artigos publicados de 2009 a 2019 encontrados nas principais bases de dados em ciências da saúde. A avaliação dos algoritmos foi realizada com 27 enfermeiros, utilizando a técnica de Delphi. Para a análise de dados, foi adotado o índice de validade de conteúdo. Resultados: Os juízes consideraram os algoritmos entre inadequados e adequados na primeira avaliação e entre adequados e totalmente adequados na segunda avaliação. O índice de validade de conteúdo geral foi de 0,923 na primeira avaliação e 1,0 na segunda avaliação. Conclusão: Após revisão da literatura, os algoritmos foram construídos e validados por profissionais com experiência na área, obtendo concordância entre os juízes na segunda avaliação.