No abstract

Background: Nearly 500,000 new cases of cervical cancer are estimated annually worldwide. Three vaccines are currently licensed to prevent cervical cancer. The success of vaccination depends mainly on the prevalence of HPV genotypes, and many cases of HPV infection have been diagnosed after vaccination. Our aim was to search for HPV genotyping in cervical samples to verify the proportion of women that remain susceptible to infection even after vaccination. Methods: 21,017 liquid-based cervical (LBC) specimens were received for cytology and HPV detection from 2015 to 2018. Before slide preparations for cytology, a 1,000-μL aliquot was taken from the LBC fixative and subjected to automated DNA extraction and multiplex PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis to detect and classify HPV. Results: HPV was detected in 895 (4.3%) specimens. The most prevalent genotype was HPV-16, followed by HPV-58 and HPV-66. A total of 258 (28.8%) cases were positive for high-risk (HR)-HPV types (66, 59, 39, 56, 30, 35, 53, 51, 68, 82, and 70) that are not covered by the HPV vaccines. Conclusion: A significant proportion of HPV types detected in cytological specimens are representative of HR-HPV not covered by the available vaccines. The health system should be aware of the considerable percentage of women who are not being immunized and will continue to need cervical cancer screening.

Objective: To test the performance of a new fixative for pap smear collection for liquid-based cervical cytology, CellPreserv® and compare it with the commercially available, PreservCyt® used in the diagnosis and detection of human papillomavirus (HPV). Methods: Seven hundred twenty five women participated in this study after signing an informed consent. The specimens were collected using a traditional device, agitated in PBS, and equally divided in both fixatives. The slides were prepared routinely, stained by Papanicolaou, examined blindly by 2 cytologists, and reviewed by one cytopathologist. To search for HPV, 1,000 μL from each fixative was taken and processed by polymerase chain reaction. Results: Considering the adequacy of samples, both fixatives had similar results – 0.33 and 0.32% of the cases unsatisfactory for PreservCyt® and CellPreserv®, respectively. Considering the 701 satisfactory cases and comparing the new fixative to the traditional fixative, there was 99.3% concordance between both. The results regarding the HPV detection was 100% concordant between the 2 fixatives. Conclusion: The new methanol-based fixative, CellPreserv®, is cheaper and equally efficient for treating cervical cancer screening and for HPV detection, and can be safely used by the health system prevailing in low-income countries.