CRLF2 rearrangements, JAK1/2 point mutations, and JAK2 fusion genes have been identified in Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a recently described subtype of pediatric high-risk B-precursor ALL (B-ALL) which exhibits a gene expression profile similar to Ph-positive ALL and has a poor prognosis. Hyperactive JAK/STAT and PI3K/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling is common in this highrisk subset. We, therefore, investigated the efficacy of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib and the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin in xenograft models of 8 pediatric B-ALL cases with and without CRLF2 and JAK genomic lesions. Ruxolitinib treatment yielded significantly lower peripheral blast counts compared with vehicle (P < .05) in 6 of 8 human leukemia xenografts and lower splenic blast counts (P < . IntroductionSurvival rates for childhood B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) approach 90% with current combination chemotherapy regimens. 1 Intensification of chemotherapy regimens has largely been responsible for dramatic improvements in survival; however, recent modifications have yielded diminishing returns, particularly in a subset of leukemias that are relatively resistant to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. The identification of underlying genetic alterations in chemotherapy-resistant subtypes, particularly lesions that drive leukemogenesis and can be targeted with novel therapies, remains an urgent need.Genome-wide analyses and next-generation sequencing approaches have advanced our understanding of potential leukemogenic mutations in pediatric ALL. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Recently, these analyses identified a cohort of clinically high-risk pediatric B-precursor ALL with gene expression profiles similar to those of Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL (Ph ϩ ALL, also termed BCR-ABL1-positive ALL). 2,4,8 This Ph-like cohort suffers high rates of relapse and mortality. The similarity to Ph ϩ ALL suggests that aberrant kinase activity may also drive this subset of ALL. Indeed, several lesions affecting kinase activity and cytokine signaling have recently been identified in Ph-like ALL. 9 Rearrangements in CRLF2 (cytokine receptor-like factor 2), leading to overexpression of this component of the heterodimeric cytokine receptor for thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), are present in up to 7% of childhood B-precursor ALL overall, 10-12 represent approximately half of Ph-like ALLs, 8 and are highly associated with point mutations in Janus kinase (JAK) family members. 11,13-15 Moreover, CRLF2 overexpression is an independent negative prognostic factor in high-risk pediatric B-ALL. 16 The frequency of genetic alterations in CRLF2 and JAK2 in high-risk B-ALL and Down syndrome-associated ALL 10,17 suggests that these lesions may be key events in leukemogenesis. Consistent with its role in early B-cell development, we have previously demonstrated that TSLP stimulates proliferation of precursor B-ALL cell lines. 18,19 Similarly, JAK signaling has been implicated in BCR-ABL1-mediated transform...

Background HuMax-IL8 (now known as BMS-986253) is a novel, fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukin-8 (IL-8), a chemokine that promotes tumor progression, immune escape, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Studies have demonstrated that high serum IL-8 levels correlate with poor prognosis in many malignant tumors. Preclinical studies have shown that IL-8 blockade may reduce mesenchymal features in tumor cells, making them less resistant to treatment. Methods Fifteen patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced solid tumors were enrolled in this 3 + 3 dose-escalation trial at four dose levels (4, 8, 16, or 32 mg/kg). HuMax-IL8 was given IV every 2 weeks, and patients were followed for safety and immune monitoring at defined intervals up to 52 weeks. Results All enrolled patients (five chordoma, four colorectal, two prostate, and one each of ovarian, papillary thyroid, chondrosarcoma, and esophageal) received at least one dose of HuMax-IL8. Eight patients had received three or more prior lines of therapy and five patients had received prior immunotherapy. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in five patients (33%), mostly grade 1. Two patients receiving the 32 mg/kg dose had grade 2 fatigue, hypophosphatemia, and hypersomnia. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Although no objective tumor responses were observed, 11 patients (73%) had stable disease with median treatment duration of 24 weeks (range, 4–54 weeks). Serum IL-8 was significantly reduced on day 3 of HuMax-IL8 treatment compared to baseline ( p = 0.0004), with reductions in IL-8 seen at all dose levels. Conclusions HuMax-IL8 is safe and well-tolerated. Ongoing studies are evaluating the combination of IL-8 blockade and other immunotherapies. Trial registration NCTN, NCT02536469. Registered 23 August 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02536469?term=NCT02536469&rank=1 . Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-019-0706-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Therapeutic cancer vaccines have gained significant popularity in recent years as new approaches for specific oncologic indications emerge. Three therapeutic cancer vaccines are FDA approved and one is currently approved by the EMA as monotherapy with modest treatment effects. Combining therapeutic cancer vaccines with other treatment modalities like radiotherapy (RT), hormone therapy, immunotherapy, and/or chemotherapy have been investigated as a means to enhance immune response and treatment efficacy. There is growing preclinical and clinical data that combination of checkpoint inhibitors and vaccines can induce immunogenic intensification with favorable outcomes. Additionally, novel methods for identifying targetable neoantigens hold promise for personalized vaccine development. In this article, we review the rationale for various therapeutic combinations, clinical trial experiences, and future directions. We also highlight the most promising developments that could lead to approval of novel therapeutic cancer vaccines.