Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) exerts a variety of biological responses through specific receptors: three subtypes of the EDG-family receptors, LPA 1 , LPA 2 , and LPA 3 (formerly known as EDG-2, EDG-4, and EDG-7, respectively), and LPA 4 /GPR23, structurally distinct from the EDG-family receptors, have so far been identified. In the present study, we characterized the action mechanisms of 3-(4-[4-([1-(2-chlorophenyl)ethoxy]carbonyl amino)-3-methyl-5-isoxazolyl] benzylsulfanyl) propanoic acid (Ki16425) on the EDG-family LPA receptors. Ki16425 inhibited several responses specific to LPA, depending on the cell types, without any appreciable effect on the responses to other related lipid receptor agonists, including sphingosine 1-phosphate. With the cells overexpressing LPA 1 , LPA 2 , or LPA 3 , we examined the selectivity and mode of inhibition by Ki16425 against the LPA-induced actions and compared them with those of dioctyl glycerol pyrophosphate (DGPP 8:0), a recently identified antagonist for LPA receptors. Ki16425 inhibited the LPA-induced response in the decreasing order of LPA 1 Ն LPA 3 Ͼ Ͼ LPA 2 , whereas DGPP 8:0 preferentially inhibited the LPA 3 -induced actions. Ki16425 inhibited LPA-induced guanosine 5Ј-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding as well as LPA receptor binding to membrane fractions with a same pharmacological specificity as in intact cells. The difference in the inhibition profile of Ki16425 and DGPP 8:0 was exploited for the evaluation of receptor subtypes involved in responses to LPA in A431 cells. Finally, Ki16425 also inhibited LPA-induced longterm responses, including DNA synthesis and cell migration. In conclusion, Ki16425 selectively inhibits LPA receptor-mediated actions, especially through LPA 1 and LPA 3 ; therefore, it may be useful in evaluating the role of LPA and its receptor subtypes involved in biological actions.Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) has been shown to elicit diverse biological actions, including Ca 2ϩ mobilization, change in cAMP accumulation, change in cell shape and motility in association with actin rearrangement, and proliferation in a variety of cell types (Moolenaar, 1999;Contos et al., 2000;Ye et al., 2002). Extracellular LPA has also been shown to be involved in certain diseases, such as atherosclerosis and cancer (Xu et al., 1995(Xu et al., , 2001Siess et al., 1999;Maschberger et al., 2000). LPA was first thought to be released from activated platelets; however, a major part of extracellular LPA has been shown to be produced from lysophosphatidylcholine by lysophospholipase D, which was previously called autotaxin (Sano et al., 2002;Tokumura et al., 2002;Umezu-Goto et al., 2002). The concentration of plasma LPA is about 100 nM, and its serum concentration can be as high as 5 M (Sano et al., 2002). LPA increases low-density lipoprotein during its oxidation, activates endothelial cells (Siess et al., This work was supported in part by a research grant grants-in-aid for scientific research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and by research gr...

The concentration of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) in plasma or serum is much higher than the half-maximal concentration of the sphingolipid needed to stimulate its receptors. Nevertheless, the inositol phosphate response to plasma or serum mediated by Edg-3, one of the S1P receptors, which was overexpressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, was much smaller than the response expected from the total amount of S1P in these samples. The inositol phosphate response to exogenous S1P was markedly attenuated in the presence of charcoal-treated low-S1P serum. The inhibitory effect was lost by boiling but not by dialysis of the serum. The inhibitory action of the serum was specific to S1P and was associated with the trapping of exogenous S1P; the inositol phosphate response to P(2)-purinergic agonists was somewhat enhanced by the charcoal-treated serum. Among the components of plasma or serum, lipoproteins such as low-density and high-density lipoproteins showed a stronger activity for trapping S1P than lipoprotein-deficient serum. Consistent with this observation, we detected a 15-100-fold higher amount of S1P per unit amount of protein in lipoproteins than in the lipoprotein-deficient serum. Thus even though the protein content of the lipoprotein fraction contributes to only 4% of the total protein content of plasma or serum, more than 60% of S1P is distributed in this fraction. These results suggest that the tight binding of S1P to the components of serum or plasma, including lipoproteins, may interfere with the S1P binding to its receptors and thereby attenuate the lipid-receptor-mediated actions in the cells.

T cell death-associated gene 8 (TDAG8) has been reported to be a receptor for psychosine. Ovarian cancer G-protein-coupled receptor 1 (OGR1) and GPR4, Gprotein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) closely related to TDAG8, however, have recently been identified as protonsensing or extracellular pH-responsive GPCRs that stimulate inositol phosphate and cAMP production, respectively. In the present study, we examined whether TDAG8 senses extracellular pH change. In the several cell types that were transfected with TDAG8 cDNA, cAMP was markedly accumulated in response to neutral to acidic extracellular pH, with a peak response at approximately pH 7.0 -6.5. The pH effect was inhibited by copper ions and was reduced or lost in cells expressing mutated TDAG8 in which histidine residues were changed to phenylalanine. In the membrane fractions prepared from TDAG8-transfected cells, guanosine 5-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) binding activity and adenylyl cyclase activity were remarkably stimulated in response to neutral and acidic pH. The concentration-dependent effect of extracellular protons on cAMP accumulation was shifted to the right in the presence of psychosine. The inhibitory psychosine effect was also observed for pH-dependent actions in OGR1-and GPR4-expressing cells but not for prostaglandin E 2 -and sphingosine 1-phosphate-induced actions in any pH in native and sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor-expressing cells. Glucosylsphingosine and sphingosylphosphorylcholine similarly inhibited the pHdependent action, although to a lesser extent. Psychosinesensitive and pH-dependent cAMP accumulation was also observed in mouse thymocytes. We concluded that TDAG8 is one of the proton-sensing GPCRs coupling to adenylyl cyclase and psychosine, and its related lysosphingolipids behave as if they were antagonists against proteinsensing receptors, including TDAG8, GPR4, and OGR1. TDAG81 was initially cloned as an orphan GPCR, which is up-regulated during the programmed cell death of T lymphocytes (1-3). This gene product has recently been reported (4) to be a receptor for psychosine, a lysosphingolipid, which induces the formation of multinuclear cells. OGR1, which shares 41% identical amino acids with TDAG8, was initially reported (5) to be a receptor for sphingosylphosphorylcholine (SPC). GPR4 also shares homology with TDAG8 and was identified as a receptor for lysolipids, including lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) and SPC (6). It has recently been reported (7), however, that OGR1 and GPR4 sense extracellular protons through histidine residues of receptors and are coupled to G-proteins to stimulate intracellular signaling pathways. Thus, OGR1 stimulation causes inositol phosphate production, and the subsequent mobilization of intracellular calcium and GPR4 stimulation induces cAMP accumulation, probably reflecting the activation of adenylyl cyclase in response to an extracellular pH change (7). These results raise the possibility that TDAG8 may also respond to extracellular pH change and stimulate intracellular signaling pathways.If TDAG8 is prov...

We examined the actions of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) on signaling pathways in Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with putative S1P receptor subtypes, i.e. Edg-1, AGR16/H218 (Edg-5), and Edg-3. Among these receptor-transfected cells, there was no significant difference in the expressing numbers of the S1P receptors and their affinities to S1P, which were estimated by [ 3 H]S1P binding to the cells. In vector-transfected cells, S1P slightly increased cytosolic Ca 2؉ concentration ([Ca 2؉ ] i ) in association with inositol phosphate production, reflecting phospholipase C activation; the S1P-induced actions were markedly enhanced in the Edg-3-transfected cells and moderately so in the AGR16-transfected cells. In comparison with vector-transfected cells, the S1P-induced [Ca 2؉ ] i increase was also slightly enhanced in the Edg-1-transfected cells. In all cases, the inositol phosphate and Ca 2؉ responses to S1P were partially inhibited by pertussis toxin (PTX). S1P also significantly increased cAMP content in a PTX-insensitive manner in all the transfected cells; the rank order of their intrinsic activity of S1P receptor subtypes was AGR16 > Edg-3 > Edg-1. In the presence of forskolin, however, S1P significantly inhibited cAMP accumulation at a lower concentration (1-100 nM) of S1P in a manner sensitive to PTX in the Edg-1-transfected cells but not in either the Edg-3 or AGR16-transfected cells. As for cell migration activity evaluated by cell number across the filter of blind Boyden chamber, Edg-1 and Edg-3 were equally potent, but AGR16 was ineffective. Thus, S1P receptors may couple to both PTX-sensitive and -insensitive G-proteins, resulting in the selective regulation of the phospholipase C-Ca 2؉ system, adenylyl cyclase-cAMP system, and cell migration activity, according to the receptor subtype.Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), 1 one of the sphingolipid metabolites, has recently been suggested to affect a variety of cellular processes (1, 2). These cellular responses elicited by S1P have first been ascribed to the intracellular action of the lipid, because S1P accumulated in the cells in response to some kinds of cytokines, and moreover, S1P induced Ca 2ϩ mobilization in a cell-free system (3-5). On the other hand, these S1P-induced responses are also accompanied by the stimulation of several early signaling events that are usually regulated by cell-surface receptors. These signaling events include activation of PLC (6 -9), an increase in [Ca 2ϩ ] i (10 -12), regulation of adenylyl cyclase (6, 9, 10, 13), and Rho activation (14, 15). The presence of the latter mechanism has been supported by the recent identification of several cDNAs encoding G-protein-coupled receptors for S1P, i.e. Edg-1, AGR16/H218, and .The transfection experiments of these S1P receptor subtypes demonstrated that these putative S1P receptors can actually couple to multiple signaling pathways. Thus, the previous transfection experiments suggest the involvement of these putative S1P receptor subtypes in the regulation of multiple signal...

No abstract