The purpose of this study is to determine the implementation of electronic-based traffic case resolution in the regions to determine the obstacles in solving electronic-based traffic cases. This type of research uses empirical research. The type of research used in this research is empirical research. Implementation of electronic-based traffic case settlement in the regions, where the offender receives a ticket ID via SMS, then makes a transfer via a bank account. After that, bring proof of e-ticket payment to the district attorney to exchange the confiscated evidence, then the offender gets a ticket ID via SMS, the offender goes to the district court to attend the trial and pay there and the offender receives the ticket ID via SMS. Offenders come to the court to see the announcement of the traffic court and the court directs to pay at the prosecutor's office and the obstacles to solving electronic-based traffic cases, namely legal factors, social factors and community factors. In the implementation of the settlement of traffic cases in the future, this should be stated in the law so that its application can still be clearer, then more in-depth socialization is also needed regarding the prosecution process so that the public will be able to understand.  Abstrak:Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pelaksanaan penyelesaian perkara lalu lintas berbasis elektronik di daerah untuk mengetahui hambatan-hambatan penyelesaian perkara lalu lintas berbasis elektronik. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian empiris. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini jenis penelitian empiris. Pelaksanaan penyelesaian perkara lalu lintas berbasis elektronik di daerah yaitu  pelanggar menerima ID Tilang melalui SMS, kemudian melakukan transfer melalui rekening bank. Setelah itu membawa bukti pembayaran e-Tilang ke kejaksaan negeri untuk ditukar dengan barang bukti yang disita, kemudian si Pelanggar mendapatkan ID Tilang melalui SMS, si pelanggar ke pengadilan negeri untuk mengikuti sidang dan membayar disana dan si pelanggar menerima ID Tilang melalui sms. Pelanggar mendatangi pengadilan untuk melihat pengumuman sidang lalu lintasdan pihak pengadilan mengarahkan untuk membayar di kejaksaan dan hambatan-hambatan penyelesaian perkara lalu lintas berbasis elektronik yaitu faktor hukum, faktor social dan faktor masyarakat. Dalam pelaksanaan penyelesaian perkara lalu lintas kedepan seharusnya ini dituangkan di dalam undang undang sehingga penerapannya masih bisa lebih jelas, kemudian juga dibutuhkan sosialisasi yang lebih mendalam terkait dengan proses penindakannya sehingga masyarakat akan bisa memahami.

Indonesia is still classified as a country that is in a position of corruption based on the results of the release of Transparency International Indonesia. Even in cases of criminal acts of corruption have reached remote areas. To suppress this rate, the central government to the regions then formed a Task Force for Sweeping Illegal Charges (Satgas Saber Extortion). Has a role to take action against and prevent the occurrence of criminal acts of corruption in the community. This study aims to determine the role of Saber Pungli in eradicating corruption. The research method used is normative-empirical legal research. The results of the study show that Saber Pungli is not yet optimal in carrying out corruption eradication work in the regions.

The guaranted of protection to a Justice Collaborator is stipulated in Article 32 of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption, 2003) as ratified as Law Number 7 Year 2006 stipulates that each State Party is obliged to provide physical and psychological protection against witnesses and experts in the disclosure of criminal acts of corruption. As the development progresses of corruption disclosure in Indonesia, the arrangement of Justice Collaborator is then started to be regulated explicitly in Law Number 31 Year 2014 on Protection of Witness and Victim.               Although physical, legal and special protection guarantees against the Justice Collaborator already exist. In fact, in the disclosure of a crime of corruption committed crime, a witness of the perpetrator who cooperates with law enforcement gets bullied until threats are killed. For example in the disclosure of corruption cases involving a number of politicians Political Parties in Indonesia. Keywords: Justice Collaborator, Protection, Corruption

Indonesia as a paradise for narcotics distribution in Southeast Asia is inseparable from the influence of the Golden Triangle Syndicate, which is a narcotics distribution syndicate in accordance with the golden triangle line that covers three countries, Thailand, Laos and Myanmar. All in various narcotics cases revealed by the National Narcotics Agency or the Police as if the state was made helpless, some convicts who can be behind bars with Correctional Institutions (Lapas) are able to connect narcotics distribution in Indonesia. Therefore, it is necessary to uncover strategies through the role of Justice Collaborator but they are not easy to implement. This study discusses how to request remission rights for narcotics prisoners with Juctice Collaborator status in Lapas Class III Pohuwato. The research method used in this study is the normative-empirical legal research method. The results of the study show that remission is a right for inmates so that it cannot be eliminated, but it can be limited by the additional requirements that must be fulfilled, namely becoming a Justice Collaborator. From 28 narcotics prisoners, only 8 people get remission. As for prisoners who have not received remission, they are constrained in a letter of justice collaborator from investigators / prosecutors.