BackgroundEnd‐tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) correlates with systemic blood flow and resuscitation rate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and may potentially direct chest compression performance. We compared ETCO2‐directed chest compressions with chest compressions optimized to pediatric basic life support guidelines in an infant swine model to determine the effect on rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).Methods and ResultsForty 2‐kg piglets underwent general anesthesia, tracheostomy, placement of vascular catheters, ventricular fibrillation, and 90 seconds of no‐flow before receiving 10 or 12 minutes of pediatric basic life support. In the optimized group, chest compressions were optimized by marker, video, and verbal feedback to obtain American Heart Association‐recommended depth and rate. In the ETCO2‐directed group, compression depth, rate, and hand position were modified to obtain a maximal ETCO2 without video or verbal feedback. After the interval of pediatric basic life support, external defibrillation and intravenous epinephrine were administered for another 10 minutes of CPR or until ROSC. Mean ETCO2 at 10 minutes of CPR was 22.7±7.8 mm Hg in the optimized group (n=20) and 28.5±7.0 mm Hg in the ETCO2‐directed group (n=20; P=0.02). Despite higher ETCO2 and mean arterial pressure in the latter group, ROSC rates were similar: 13 of 20 (65%; optimized) and 14 of 20 (70%; ETCO2 directed). The best predictor of ROSC was systemic perfusion pressure. Defibrillation attempts, epinephrine doses required, and CPR‐related injuries were similar between groups.ConclusionsThe use of ETCO2‐directed chest compressions is a novel guided approach to resuscitation that can be as effective as standard CPR optimized with marker, video, and verbal feedback.
Objective To determine whether end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2)-guided chest compression delivery improves survival over standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after prolonged asphyxial arrest. Design Preclinical randomized controlled study. Setting University animal research laboratory. Subjects 1–2-week-old swine. Interventions After undergoing a 20-minute asphyxial arrest, animals received either standard or ETCO2-guided CPR. In the standard group, chest compression delivery was optimized by video and verbal feedback to maintain the rate, depth, and release within published guidelines. In the ETCO2-guided group, chest compression rate and depth were adjusted to obtain a maximal ETCO2 level without other feedback. CPR included 10 minutes of basic life support followed by advanced life support for 10 minutes or until return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Measurements and Main Results Mean ETCO2 at 10 minutes of CPR was 34 ± 8 torr in the ETCO2 group (n=14) and 19 ± 9 torr in the standard group (n=14; p=0.0001). The ROSC rate was 7/14 (50%) in the ETCO2 group and 2/14 (14%) in the standard group (p=0.04). The chest compression rate averaged 143 ± 10/minute in the ETCO2 group and 102 ± 2/minute in the standard group (p<0.0001). Neither asphyxia-related hypercarbia nor epinephrine administration confounded the use of ETCO2-guided chest compression delivery. The response of the relaxation arterial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure to the initial epinephrine administration was greater in the ETCO2 group than in the standard group (p=0.01 and p=0.03, respectively). The prevalence of resuscitation-related injuries was similar between groups. Conclusions ETCO2-guided chest compression delivery is an effective resuscitation method that improves early survival after prolonged asphyxial arrest in this neonatal piglet model. Optimizing ETCO2 levels during CPR required that chest compression delivery rate exceed current guidelines. The use of physiologic feedback during CPR has the potential to provide optimized and individualized resuscitative efforts.
Objectives: With decreasing mortality in PICUs, a growing number of survivors experience long-lasting physical impairments. Early physical rehabilitation and mobilization during critical illness are safe and feasible, but little is known about the prevalence in PICUs. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of rehabilitation for critically ill children and associated barriers. Design: National 2-day point prevalence study. Setting: Eighty-two PICUs in 65 hospitals across the United States. Patients: All patients admitted to a participating PICU for greater than or equal to 72 hours on each point prevalence day. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was prevalence of physical therapy– or occupational therapy–provided mobility on the study days. PICUs also prospectively collected timing of initial rehabilitation team consultation, clinical and patient mobility data, potential mobility–associated safety events, and barriers to mobility. The point prevalence of physical therapy– or occupational therapy–provided mobility during 1,769 patient-days was 35% and associated with older age (adjusted odds ratio for 13–17 vs < 3 yr, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.5–3.1) and male gender (adjusted odds ratio for females, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61–0.95). Patients with higher baseline function (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category, ≤ 2 vs > 2) less often had rehabilitation consultation within the first 72 hours (27% vs 38%; p < 0.001). Patients were completely immobile on 19% of patient-days. A potential safety event occurred in only 4% of 4,700 mobility sessions, most commonly a transient change in vital signs. Out-of-bed mobility was negatively associated with the presence of an endotracheal tube (adjusted odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.1–0.2) and urinary catheter (adjusted odds ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.1–0.6). Positive associations included family presence in children less than 3 years old (adjusted odds ratio, 4.55; 95% CI, 3.1–6.6). Conclusions: Younger children, females, and patients with higher baseline function less commonly receive rehabilitation in U.S. PICUs, and early rehabilitation consultation is infrequent. These findings highlight the need for systematic design of rehabilitation interventions for all critically ill children at risk of functional impairments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.