The aim of the research was to examine characteristics of individual value system and individual anomia prediction for driving behavior. A total of 108 respondents participated in the study. The results showed that the value system integrity / disintegrity indicator predicts distracted driving, explaining 18% of variation and being statistically significant. Internal vacuum and age are statistically significant and negatively predict risky driving in 17% of variation. Age as a statistically significant factor is associated with a safe and courteous driving, this explains 12% of variation. Value system integrity / disintegrity indicator and gender are significantly negatively associated with the summary indicator of dangerous driving, this explains 22% of variation. Age is significantly negatively associated with distracted driving, explaining 30% of variation. An individual deviation from prescribed rules or customs and gender are significantly associated with aggressive behavior against other drivers, explaining 28% of variation. Age is significantly associated with risky driving; this model explains 13% of variation. Age is significantly negatively associated with the summary indicator of dangerous driving, explaining 37% of variation. The results can serve as the basis to create new measures for driving behaviour regulation and they might also be applicable to psychologists' professional activity.