No abstract

SUMMARYCoronary artery anomalies are found in 0.6% to 1.5% of coronary angiograms. Angiographic recognition of these vessels is important because of their clinical significance and importance in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty or cardiac surgery.We reviewed the database of the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory of Uludag Medical University in Bursa, Turkey. All patients who were subjected to coronary angiography from 1994 to 2001 were included.The study included 12,059 patients who underwent diagnostic coronary arteriography during the 8 year period. One hundred patients had primary congenital coronary anomalies. Ninty-five (95%) of the patients had anomalies of origin and distribution while five (5%) had coronary artery fistulae. The left main coronary artery (LMCA) was the most common anomalous vessel involved (forty-eight (48%) of the patients). An LMCA distribution anomaly was observed in these 48 patients. An anomalous right coronary artery (RCA) was the second most common anomaly, seen in twenty-two (22%) of the patients. An anomalous circumflex artery (Cx) was the third most common anomaly, seen in seventeen. Five patients had a coronary artery fistulae. The fistulae in our series were small without significant shunt circulation.Primary congenital coronary anomalies are isolated lesions and generally have no relation with other congenital heart diseases. They do not appear to be associated with an increased risk for development of coronary atherosclerosis. Angiographic recognition of these vessels is important because of their clinical significance and importance in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty or cardiac surgery. (Int Heart J 2005; 46: 97-103)

In conclusion, in this cross-sectional study, we clearly found that even one night of SD is associated with higher values of inter-AEMD and intra-AEMD in healthy young adults.

Sublingual nifedipine is commonly used in hypertensive crisis, however, it may result in several adverse effects such as reflex tachycardia, headache, and flushing. Research is continuing to find a new drug that has the same efficiency and fewer side effects. Sublingual captopril, a new preparation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lowers blood pressure. It is not known whether it is effective in these emergent clinical settings. Therefore we designed a randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of those two drugs in hypertensive crisis. Eighty patients (32 male and 48 female) with hypertensive crisis were included in the study; their mean age was 43.4 +/- 7.9 years. Nifedipine 10 mg was given sublingually to 34 and captopril 25 mg to 46 patients randomly. There was no difference between the two drugs with respect to their antihypertensive effect. Heart rate significantly dropped (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) in the patients taking captopril, but no changes were observed in the patients taking nifedipine. Twenty-three of 34 patients taking nifedipine encountered adverse effects. Adverse effects were observed in only three patients taking captopril (p < 0.001). Sublingual captopril is as effective as and has less side effects than sublingual nifedipine. Because sublingual captopril has fewer side effects, it may be safer than nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive crisis.http://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/00547/bibs/8n3p147.html

No abstract