No abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) of oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) patients using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro. We used the consecutive sampling technique to recruit patients who were clinically diagnosed with OSMF (n = 112). Data were collected using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, which contains a total of 26 questions. The first two questions, related to overall QoL and overall health status, were evaluated separately. The remaining questions (3–26), which represented four domains—physical, psychological, social, and environmental health—were evaluated separately. Patients were asked questions in their native language (Urdu). The relationship between these four domains of life was evaluated with gender, age categories, functional staging, and habit duration using the independent t-test to determine statistical significance. Cronbach’s Alpha was used to assess the reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF domains. The overall QoL of the OSMF patients was considerably poor, and the majority of the patients were unsatisfied with their oral health status. The age variable significantly affected the scores of all domains except for social relationships, whereas habit duration and functional staging of OSMF did not significantly affect the scores of all domains. The domains of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire (translated into the Urdu language) showed good reliability, except for social relationships.

Aim: To evaluate the Clinico-Demographic variables in patients of Oral Submucous Fibrosis Study Design:  Descriptive Cross Sectional Place and Duration of Study: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Liaquat Medical University Hospital from December 2017 to February 2019. Methodology: The recruitment of patients was done after the clinical diagnosis of oral sub mucous fibrosis (OSMF) patients. The demographic information and associated factors were recorded on the proforma. Mouth opening (MO) was measured between upper and lower central incisors with vernier caliper. Burning sensation (BS) and pain were measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The data were analyzed by SPSS Version-16. Results: Male and female were (66%) and (34%) respectively. The mean age was 41.04±11.24. The frequency of gutka usage was 44% and 43% followed by betel nut as 21% and 23% in functional stages as per Inter Incisal Mouth Opening (IIMO-2) and (IIMO-3) respectively. The BS was shown as severe 49% and 40% followed by moderate as 32% and 37% in functional stages IIMO-2 and IIMO-3 respectively whereas pain was shown as severe 82% and 18% and as moderate 63% and 37% in functional stage M2 and M3 respectively showed statistically significant relationship (p=0.041). Conclusion: Males were more affected and middle aged patients were more involved. Majority of patients were using gutka and had 3rd functional stage of mouth opening. The burning sensation and pain were the most common clinical complains. There was significant relationship of functional stages with pain.

No abstract

The objective of the present study was to assess the oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) patients before and after standard treatment. A convenient sampling technique was used to recruit the clinically diagnosed patients of OSMF (n = 130). Based on the medical treatment, the patients were randomly divided into two study groups (group A and B). The group A patients received submucosal intralesional injections of dexamethasone (2 mL; 4 gm/mL), while group B patients received hyaluronidase (1500 IU). Both the group A and B patients received respective medical therapy biweekly for a period of five weeks. At the follow up visit (6 months), the impact of treatment on OHRQoL was assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14). Data were analyzed by a chi-square test for quantitative variables and an independent t-test for qualitative variables. The comparison of all clinical parameters before and after treatment was performed by a paired t-test. The results after treatment showed that there was a significant improvement in all domains of OHIP-14 (p = 0.001) except psychological disability (p = 0.243). In addition, the OHRQoL of patients was significantly improved following the treatment.