Objectives: Management of spontaneous pneumomediastinum in the pediatric population is highly variable. There are limited data on the use of diagnostic tests and the need for admission. Our objectives were to characterize the management of pediatric spontaneous pneumomediastinum, determine the diagnostic yield of advanced imaging, and describe the patients' outcomes.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients presenting to a single tertiary pediatric emergency department between January 2008 and February 2015 diagnosed with pneumomediastinum. Patients were identified using 2 complementary strategies: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision billing codes and a keyword search of the hospital radiology database. Results:We identified 183 patients with spontaneous pneumomediastinum.The mean age was 12.8 ± 4.8 years. Diagnosis was established by chest radiograph (CXR) in 165 (90%) patients, chest computed tomography in 15 (8%), neck imaging in 2 (1%), and abdominal imaging in 1. After diagnosis, many patients underwent additional studies: repeat CXR (99, 54%), chest computed tomography (53, 29%), esophagram (45, 25%), and laryngoscopy (15, 8%). Seventy-eight percent of patients (n = 142) were admitted with a median length of stay of 27 hours (18.4-45.6 hours). Six patients returned to the emergency department within 96 hours for persistent chest pain; 2 were admitted, and 1 was found to have worsening pneumomediastinum on CXR. We performed a secondary analysis on 3 key subgroups: primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum (64, 35%), secondary gastrointestinalassociated pneumomediastinum (31, 17%), and secondary respiratoryassociated pneumomediastinum (88, 48%). No patients in the study received an invasive intervention for pneumomediastinum. In all patients, further studies did not yield additional diagnostic information.Conclusions: Our data suggest that patients with spontaneous pneumomediastinum who are clinically well appearing can be managed conservatively with clinical observation, avoiding exposure to radiation and invasive procedures.
BACKGROUND: In May 2016, the American Academy of Pediatrics published a clinical practice guideline for brief resolved unexplained events (BRUEs). We evaluated for changes in the management of BRUE after guideline publication. METHODS: Using a pediatric multicenter administrative database, we compared rates of admission, testing, revisits, and diagnoses in patients diagnosed with a BRUE or apparent lifethreatening event (ALTE) during 2017 with rates of admission, testing, revisits, and diagnoses in patients diagnosed with ALTE during 2015. We used interrupted time series analysis to test if the guideline was associated with changes in admission rate for all patients with ALTE or BRUE between 2015 and 2017. We stratified analyses by age (0-60 and 61-365 days). RESULTS: A total of 9501 patients were included (5608 in 2015 and 3893 in 2017). The admission rate decreased by 5.7% (95% confidence interval, 3.8% to 7.5%) for infants 0 to 60 days and by 18.0% (95% confidence interval, 15.3% to 20.7%) for infants 61 to 365 days from 2015 to 2017. Patients in 2017 had lower rates of EEG, brain MRI, chest radiography, laboratory testing, and urinalyses compared with patients in 2015. In the interrupted time series analysis model (n = 13 977), guideline publication was associated with decreasing admission rates (0.2% per week) for infants 61 to 365 days (P , .001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients evaluated in 2015, patients with BRUE or ALTE in 2017 have lower rate of admissions and testing. Findings may be due to changes in the definition of BRUE and guideline recommendations. WHAT'S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: In 2016, the American Academy of Pediatrics published a clinical practice guideline in which the name of apparent lifethreatening events was changed to brief resolved unexplained events (BRUEs). This guideline allowed for risk stratification and provided guidance for lowrisk BRUE. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: In this review of a pediatric multicenter administrative database, BRUE admissions decreased after guideline implementation without an increase in revisits or high-acuity diagnoses. These findings reveal that changes in practice have not resulted in worse outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.