In BriefUsing miniature tags, Egert-Berg et al. record bats' movement and social interactions. Whereas species foraging on ephemeral resources search in groups, switching foraging sites, species foraging on predictable resources search alone, returning to the same sites. The results suggest a connection between resource predictability and group foraging. SUMMARYObservations of animals feeding in aggregations are often interpreted as events of social foraging, but it can be difficult to determine whether the animals arrived at the foraging sites after collective search [1][2][3][4] or whether they found the sites by following a leader [5, 6] or even independently, aggregating as an artifact of food availability [7, 8]. Distinguishing between these explanations is important, because functionally, they might have very different consequences. In the first case, the animals could benefit from the presence of conspecifics, whereas in the second and third, they often suffer from increased competition [3,[9][10][11][12][13]. Using novel miniature sensors, we recorded GPS tracks and audio of five species of bats, monitoring their movement and interactions with conspecifics, which could be inferred from the audio recordings. We examined the hypothesis that food distribution plays a key role in determining social foraging patterns [14][15][16]. Specifically, this hypothesis predicts that searching for an ephemeral resource (whose distribution in time or space is hard to predict) is more likely to favor social foraging [10,[13][14][15] than searching for a predictable resource. The movement and social interactions differed between bats foraging on ephemeral versus predictable resources. Ephemeral species changed foraging sites and showed large temporal variation nightly. They aggregated with conspecifics as was supported by playback experiments and computer simulations. In contrast, predictable species were never observed near conspecifics and showed high spatial fidelity to the same foraging sites over multiple nights. Our results suggest that resource (un)predictability influences the costs and benefits of social foraging. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONWe compared the movement and social foraging behavior of five bat species (representing four families), which cover a wide range of foraging styles and exploit different resources (see Table 1). Two species rely on ephemeral resources (henceforth the ''ephemeral foragers''): (1) the greater mouse-tailed bat (Rhinopoma microphyllum, Rhinopomatidae), an open-space insectivorous bat that preys on ephemeral insect swarms [17], and (2) the Mexican fish-eating bat (Myotis vivesi, Vespertilionidae), which forages primarily over marine waters [18, 19], where it feeds on local upwellings of fish and crustaceans [18, 19] whose exact location is difficult to predict on any given night. Indeed, our analysis of the spatial distribution of marine chlorophyll (a proxy of marine food availability [20, 21]) indicates low predictability of food spatial distribution over consecutive nights ( Figure...

Background Urbanization is one of the most influential processes on our globe, putting a great number of species under threat. Some species learn to cope with urbanization, and a few even benefit from it, but we are only starting to understand how they do so. In this study, we GPS tracked Egyptian fruit bats from urban and rural populations to compare their movement and foraging in urban and rural environments. Because fruit trees are distributed differently in these two environments, with a higher diversity in urban environments, we hypothesized that foraging strategies will differ too. Results When foraging in urban environments, bats were much more exploratory than when foraging in rural environments, visiting more sites per hour and switching foraging sites more often on consecutive nights. By doing so, bats foraging in settlements diversified their diet in comparison to rural bats, as was also evident from their choice to often switch fruit species. Interestingly, the location of the roost did not dictate the foraging grounds, and we found that many bats choose to roost in the countryside but nightly commute to and forage in urban environments. Conclusions Bats are unique among small mammals in their ability to move far rapidly. Our study is an excellent example of how animals adjust to environmental changes, and it shows how such mobile mammals might exploit the new urban fragmented environment that is taking over our landscape.

No abstract