Roads have a very important role in human life. For the present and the future, in the era of industrialization, trade and public transportation, transportation of goods and services. This study aims to determine the type of damage that occurs on the pavement surface, pavement conditions and the necessary actions on the pavement conditions of the Lahat-Pagaralam section of the bridge from Endikat to the Depati H. Duaji road of Pagaralam-Lahat by using the Pavement Condition Index method ( PCI). There are 10 types of damage to the Lahat - Pagaralam crossing from the Endikat bridge to the Depati H. Duaji Lintas Pagaralam road, namely crocodile cracks by 20.39%, obesity by 3.95%, basins by 0.66%, curl by 0.66 %, edge cracks of 3.29%, longitudinal/transverse cracks of 5.26%, fillings of 55.92%, aggregate wear of 1.32, holes of 7.24% and grooves of 1.32%. The average pavement condition index (PCI) for the Lahat - Pagaralam section from the Endikat bridge to the Depati H. Duaji Pagaralam road section is 82.63% which is included in the Very Good category. The repair methods that can be carried out are the P2 (Local Asphalt Laburan) repair method, the P5 repair method (Hole filling) and the P6 repair method (Alignment).

The access section to Benakat Village, Pali Regency is a special road made by the company, with the condition of the existing land being unpaved with a length of 1,375 meters and a width of 7 meters, and has severe damage triggered by vehicles with excess capacity or ODOL (Over Dimension Over Load)) that pass through that path. The purpose of this study was to determine the results of the calculation of rigid pavement thickness planning by comparing the 1993 AASHTO and 2017 MDPJ methods so that the road Sp. Doors – Sp. Benakat is able to accommodate ODOL vehicles. This study uses AASHTO 1993 and MDPJ 2017 as methods to produce rigid pavement thickness (Rigid Pavement) so that ODOL vehicles can pass. Based on the results of data analysis and calculations, the input indicators in each method are different for each method so that AASHTO 1993 produces a thickness of 35 cm, and in MDPJ it produces a thickness of 28.5 cm