No abstract

Rajasthan I INDI A aniidudenish@ieee.arg, khushbulakhani@gmai I.eamA bstract-The work is evalu ated through the process of measurement. But it is not necessary that the common measurement princi pi es fulfil all the r equi rements of 0 bs ervati on. To complete this task we elaborate scientific method of HCI evaluation, to catch out the accurate observation of results and compute thei r fundamental s. Scientific method covers the analyti cal part, quantitative ap pi icati ons and qual itative res ults using different computing paradigms. In this paper we highlight the computational paradigm and different scientific methods of HCI evaluation. We focus the simplest terms to observe the evaluation process of HCI in a scientific way.

Hel is undoubtedly an interdisciplinary subject and the most prominent area of research. Many researchers are focusing in this fieldll]. With time, the awareness and usability of HeI technologies among people has enormously increased and people are taking interest in exploring new domains in this area. We performed a survey on about 600 people including students, researchers, layman, professionals, etc. and analyzed their conscious ? ess of current HeI technologies along with the future expectatIOns. A graphical analysis of results has been outlined. Results highlight that people are involving themselves in the deployment of prevalent Hel technologies and look forward for a highly positive effect in near future with the emerging HeI technologies. Through this process we may circumvent the myth about user interface for impact of user interfaces to our societies. The gradual improvements in work culture and acceptance level of HeI have been highlighted besides potential health ha:mrds.

No abstract

No abstract