The purpose of the present study was to investigate how stretch reflex (SR) responses in the ankle extensor (soleus: SOL) and flexor (tibialis anterior: TA) muscles would be modulated with temporal and/or spatial predictions of external perturbations and whether their effects are specific to the standing posture. SR responses in the SOL/TA were elicited by imposing quick ankle toes-up/toes-down rotations while standing upright and in the supine position. We designed four experimental conditions based on pre-information about perturbations: no information (No Cue), the timing of the perturbation onset (TIM), the direction of the perturbation (DIR), and both the timing and direction of the perturbation (TIM/DIR). Each condition was separated and its order was counterbalanced. In the SR of TA evoked by toes-down rotation, integrated electromyography activities of the late component were significantly reduced in the TIM and TIM/DIR conditions as compared with those in the No Cue and DIR conditions. The occurrence rate of late SR components that reflects how often the reflex response was observed was also lower in the TIM and TIM/DIR conditions as compared with that in the No Cue and DIR conditions. On the other hand, no significant changes were seen among the four conditions in the early SR component in the TA and both SR components in the SOL. The same results in the occurrence rate were found in the supine position. The present results suggest (1) only temporal predictions have a remarkable effect on the SR excitability of the TA, and (2) this effect is independent of posture.

Recent studies demonstrated that the corticospinal pathway is one of the key nodes for the feedback control of human standing and that the excitability is flexibly changed according to the current state of posture. However, it has been unclear whether this pathway is also involved in a predictive control of human standing. Here, we investigated whether the corticospinal excitability of the soleus (SOL) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles during standing would be modulated anticipatorily when perturbation was impending. We measured the motor-evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex at six stimulus intensities. Three experimental conditions were set depending on predictabilities about perturbation occurrence and onset: No perturbation, No Cue, and Cue conditions. In the Cue condition, an acoustic signal was given as timing information of perturbation. The slope of the stimulus–response relation curve revealed that the TA-MEP was enhanced when postural perturbation was expected compared to when the perturbation was not expected (No Perturbation vs. No Cue, 0.023 ± 0.004 vs. 0.042 ± 0.007; No Perturbation vs. Cue, 0.023 ± 0.004 vs. 0.050 ± 0.009; Bonferroni correction, p = 0.01, respectively). In addition, two-way analysis of variance (intensity × condition) revealed the main effect of condition (F(1,13) = 6.31, p = 0.03) but not intensity and interaction when the MEP amplitude of the Cue and No Cue conditions was normalized by that in No Perturbation, suggesting the enhancement more apparent when timing information was given. The SOL-MEP was not modulated even when perturbation was expected, but it slightly reduced due to the timing information. The results of an additional experiment confirmed that the acoustic cue by itself did not affect the TA- and SOL-MEPs. Our findings suggest that a prediction of a future state of standing balance modulates the corticospinal excitability in the TA, and that the additional timing information facilitates this modulation. The corticospinal pathway thus appears to be involved in mechanisms of the predictive control as well as feedback control of standing posture.

Posturography is utilized to assess the influence of aging on postural control. Although this measurement is advantageous for finding group-level differences between the young and the elderly, it is unclear whether it has the potential to differentiate elderly individuals who are affected by various impacts of aging. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of posturography to discriminate elderly individuals from young adults. We investigated the performances of the random forest classifiers constructed from center of pressure (COP) indices for discriminating standing postures between healthy elderly and young people. Postural sways in 19 young and 31 community-dwelling elderly participants were measured using force plates in 4 standing conditions: bipedal standing, standing on a narrow base, standing on foam rubber, and standing with eyes closed. We further verified the informative predictors that contributed to the prediction model. As the results, the classifier based on the COP indices for standing on foam rubber showed the best performance (accuracy: 93.4%, sensitivity: 94.4%, specificity: 93.6%, area under the curve of receiving operator characteristics: 0.95), followed by the classifier for standing with eyes closed. The informative predictors varied depending on the postural conditions. Our findings demonstrated the potential of posturography for identifying elderly postures. The evaluation of sensory re-weighting using the appropriate COP indices would be a useful clinical tool for detecting the progress of aging on postural control.

Neural mechanisms of human standing are expected to be elucidated for preventing fallings. Postural response evoked by sudden external perturbation originates from various areas in the central nervous system. Recent studies have revealed that the corticospinal pathway is one of the key nodes for an appropriate postural response. The corticospinal pathway that mediates the early part of the electromyographic response is modulated with prediction before a perturbation occurs. Temporal prediction explicitly exhibiting an onset timing contributes to enhancing corticospinal excitability. However, how the cortical activities in the sensorimotor area with temporal prediction are processed before the corticospinal pathway enhancement remains unclear. In this study, using electroencephalography, we investigated how temporal prediction affects both neural oscillations and synchronization between sensorimotor and distal areas. Our results revealed that desynchronization of cortical oscillation at αand β-bands was observed in the sensorimotor and parietooccipital areas (Cz, CPz, Pz and POz), and those are nested in the phase at θ-band frequency. Furthermore, a reduction in the interareal phase synchrony in the α-band was induced after the timing cue for the perturbation onset. The phase synchrony at the low frequency can relay the temporal prediction among the distant areas and initiate the modulation of the local cortical activities. Such modulations contribute to the preparation for sensory processing and motor execution that are necessary for optimal responses.

The prediction of upcoming perturbation modulates postural responses in the ankle muscles. The effects of this prediction on postural responses vary according to predictable factors. When the amplitude of perturbation can be predicted, the long-latency response is set at an appropriate size for the required response, whereas when the direction of perturbation can be predicted, there is no effect. The neural mechanisms underlying these phenomena are poorly understood. Here, we examined how the corticospinal excitability of the ankle muscles [i.e., the tibialis anterior (TA), the soleus (SOL), and the medial gastrocnemius (MG), with a focus on the TA], would be modulated in five experimental conditions: (1) No-perturbation; (2) Low (anterior translation with small amplitude); (3) High (anterior translation with large amplitude); (4) Posterior (posterior translation with large amplitude); and (5) Random (Low, High, and Posterior in randomized order). We measured the motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at 50 ms before surface-translation in each condition. The electromyographic (EMG) responses evoked by surface-translations were also measured. The results showed that the TA-MEP amplitude was greater in the High condition (where the largest TA-EMG response was evoked among the five conditions) compared to that in the No-perturbation, Low, and Posterior conditions (High vs. No-perturbation, p < 0.001; High vs. Low, p = 0.001; High vs. Posterior, p = 0.001). In addition, the MEP amplitude in the Random condition was significantly greater than that in the No-perturbation and Low conditions (Random vs. No-perturbation, p = 0.002; Random vs. Low, p = 0.002). The EMG response in the TA evoked by perturbation was significantly smaller when a perturbation can be predicted (predictable vs. unpredictable, p < 0.001). In the SOL and MG muscles, no prominent modulations of the MEP amplitude or EMG response were observed, suggesting that the effects of prediction on corticospinal excitability differ between the dorsiflexor and plantar flexor muscles. These findings suggest that the corticospinal excitability in the TA is scaled in parallel with the prediction of the direction and magnitude of an upcoming perturbation in advance.