Surgical treatment has a positive effect on the quality of life of patients with metastases in the spine. However, it is not a key factor in the context of survival rate of these patients. Therefore, a decision on the possibility and necessity of surgical treatment should be taken in cooperation with the patient and oncologists of different specialties.

No abstract

The endoscopic endonasal approach, compared to the standard transoral approach, has significant advantages in that the soft palate remains intact, the oropharynx area is less damaged, and the hospitalization and rehabilitation duration is reduced. Also, there are no problems and complications such as possible failure of sutures in the oral cavity and a large wound surface in the oropharynx area. The patient can eat on his own immediately after the operation without the use of a stomach tube (it does not cause any inflammatory complications of the oral cavity). However, the surgical technique of the endoscopic endonasal approach to the C1-C2 segment is more complex than that of transoral surgery and requires the surgeon to be skilled and experienced.

On the basis of consultation analysis, a set of rules was developed to automatically generate a consultation text, depending on selected sign values. Currently, the automatic virtual consultation system, which was developed jointly by the Institute for Systems Analysis, Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, and Volynskaya Clinical Hospital №1, operates online on the vertebrologi.ru portal as one of its modules.