No abstract

Radical hysterectomy with SLN biopsy alone seems to be a safe and effective strategy for detection of lymph node metastasis and for reducing the number of patients with lower extremity lymphedema, but a more convenient and sensitive procedure for intraoperative diagnosis needs to be established.

Clinical practice guidelines for gynecologic cancers have been published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the National Cancer Institute. Whereas these guidelines form the basis for the standard of care for gynecologic malignancies in the United States, it has proven difficult to institute them in Japan due to differences in patient characteristics, health-care delivery systems, and insurance programs. Therefore, evidence-based guidelines for treating cervical cancer specifically in Japan have been under development. The Guidelines Formulation Committee and Evaluation Committee were independently established within the Committee for Treatment Guidelines for Cervical Cancer. Opinions from within and outside the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) were incorporated into the final draft, and the guidelines were published after approval by the JSGO. These guidelines are composed of ten chapters and comprise three algorithms. Each chapter consists of a clinical question, recommendations, background, objectives, explanations, and references. The objective of these guidelines is to clearly delineate the standard of care for cervical cancer treatment in Japan in order to ensure equitable care for all Japanese women diagnosed with cervical cancer.

The prognosis of MT is highly dependent on age, stage, and optimal cytoreduction. Adjuvant treatment has not been standardized, although our experience supports the use of combination platinum/taxane chemotherapy.

Aims: The aims of this study were to evaluate the factors affecting prognosis in patients with uterine sarcomas and to demonstrate that carcinosarcoma bears a similarity to high-grade endometrial carcinoma in terms of its prognosis and clinicopathological parameters. Methods: In June 2004, 17 Japanese institutions received questionnaires regarding uterine sarcomas. Study patients had uterine sarcomas initially treated at each institution between January 1990 and May 2004. Survival analyses and comparisons were performed by univariate methods. Patient data of 921 cases of endometrial adenocarcinoma were also analyzed and compared to the data with the uterine sarcomas. Results: One hundred twenty-one patients with uterine sarcomas were identified who met study eligibility criteria. In uterine sarcomas, carcinosarcoma had a worse prognosis than other sarcomas, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.302). In carcinosarcoma, significant differences were observed with age (p = 0.0388), stage (p < 0.01) and surgical procedure (with or without pelvic lymphadenectomy, p = 0.0316). In carcinosarcoma and G3 adenocarcinoma, no significant difference was identified with regard to overall survival in univariate (p = 0.191) and multivariate (p = 0.168) analyses. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that the clinical behavior of carcinosarcoma strongly resembles that of G3 endometrial adenocarcinoma, setting it apart from other ‘pure’ uterine sarcomas.