No abstract

Summary Steel self‐centering moment resisting frames (SC‐MRFs) have been validated experimentally as resilient structural systems, mainly highlighting the minimized residual drift responses but are prone to suffering high‐mode effects. In this paper, the influence of infill configurations on seismic responses of steel SC‐MRFs was first analyzed. A comparison of the previous experimental results was conducted to investigate the effect of infills on the residual drift of steel frames. In the numerical simulation, the infills were modeled as the equivalent strut diagonals, and the force–displacement of the infills was modeled using the combination of Elastic‐No Tension Material and Hysteretic Material offered by the OpenSees program. The seismic analyses of 3‐ and 9‐story SC‐MRFs with and without infills were carried out to analyze the effects of infills on the residual drift responses and high‐mode contribution under the selected ground motions. Finally, the different infill types and infill irregularities on the seismic responses were investigated to obtain general conclusions. The plastic deformations of columns and infills are also compared in the different cases of infill configurations. The results reveal that all infilled cases experience reduced peak‐story drift and force demands at the upper stories.

To quantitatively evaluate the low-cycle fatigue life of buckling-restrained braces (BRBs), an evaluation method for BRBs based on the combination of the CPD curves and CPD measurement meter (CMM) is established herein. The difference between two CPD curves (i.e., the CPD curves under constant strain amplitude loading history (C-CPD) and under random strain amplitude loading history (R-CPD)), and their selection criteria to evaluate the low-cycle fatigue life of BRBs are discussed. An example under the variable strain amplitude (VSA) loading history and an example under the multiple earthquakes are carried out. Finally, the CPD limit values of BRBs in the ANSI/AISC 341-10 and FEMA-450 are discussed by statistical analysis of the test results of BRBs. The analysis results show that the C-CPD curve can be used to evaluate the low-cycle fatigue life of BRBs under the VSA loading, and the R-CPD curve can be used to evaluate the low-cycle fatigue life of BRBs under the multiple earthquakes. The degree of reliability of the current CPD limit value is not enough. A CPD limit curve is recommended in this study to quantify the low-cycle fatigue performance of BRBs.