Kampung Luar Batang today is located at the northern end of Jakarta, which belongs to former Sunda Kelapa, the oldest area of Jakarta, about 100 meters to northwest of Kota (Batavia). The oldest mosque, AlAydrus Masjid, which was built in 1739, is located in Kampung Luar Batang and attracts pilgrims from other areas of Jakarta city, and had been declared as one of cultural heritages by the issuance of Governor Decree No. 475/1993. However, the area suffered a huge influx of population especially after independent, because of which its living environmental condition has deteriorated. Although modern buildings dominate in Kampung Luar Batang, traditional houses or houses with features of traditional architecture still exist in the kampung. How to improve the living condition and preserve the historical features of the built environment are important and urgent questions. This paper, based on the field survey, clarifies the formation and transformation process of Kampung Luar Batang and discusses the problems for the future improvement.

Kampung Luar Batang is located in the northern end of Jakarta, which belongs to former Sunda Kelapa, the oldest area of Jakarta, about 100 meters northwest of Kota (Batavia). The oldest mosque, Al-Aydrus Masjid built in 1739 is located within it; attracts pilgrims from Jakarta and suburbs; and is a declared cultural heritage under the Governor's Decree No. 475/1993. The area became overcrowded after the independence, thus deteriorating the environmental conditions. Although modern buildings dominate Kampung Luar Batang, traditional houses or houses with traditional architectural characteristics still remained there. Improvement of living conditions and preservation of historical features have become important issues. This paper discusses the characteristics of traditional kampung house, which is required to be preserved, identifying the status and condition of Kampung Luar Batang, based on the field survey.

and Shtiji FUI ＞0As a result of the case study on two cities in the south west coast ， it was clarified that the way of restoration of settlements was quit 巳 different ． ( 1) In Moratuwa ， victims have restored their settlement fer themsetves although there is few support by aid groups due to the coasta ［ regulation ． ( 2 ) in Hikkaduwa ， restoration has been advaneed initia 且 ly with support of external peQple such as international organizations and NGO ， Hewever ， residents in the buffer zone have been cenfused by the reViva ユpolicy and coast censtruction regulation ． Especially ， through the reconstruction process of the settlement in Moratuwa ， it was understood that people can recenstruct their settlement fc ) r themselves， ifthe settlement has enough physical basements such as common infrastructure and heuses suitable for their iife style and social relationship fbr mutual aid based on closeness to job or blood re 且 a しionship ．