No abstract

Bendamustine is a uniquely structuredalkylating agent that lacks cross-resistance with other alkylators. This agent has a high degreeof activity against a variety of tumor cell lines.Based on clinical data from randomized phase III trials, bendamustine, with or without rituximab, hasbeen shown to be an appropriate option for first-line treatment or treatment of relapsed/refractory patients with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Bendamustine treatment is associated with abetter therapeutic index and offers an improved overall quality of life compared to R-CHOP or R-CVP. It is now often used as achemotherapy backbone for combination with novel drugs including ibrutinib or idelalisib. This article provides a comprehensivesummaryof the clinical data along with practical adviceonhowto optimallymanagepatients with bendamustine therapy, includingdose recommendations, antiemetic prophylaxis, prevention of infusion and skin reactions, as well as prophylaxis of opportunisticinfections. This information might be helpful for clinicians using bendamustine in their daily practice.

Features of management of oncohematological patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lecture

18536 Background: R-CHOP is regarded as the best available treatment for untreated patients with aggressive and indolent B- NHL. Methods: 184 previously untreated patients with DLCL were included in retrospective study: 92 patients were treated by CHOP, 92 patients were treated by CHOP plus rituximab ( R-CHOP ). Age of patients ranged 16–87 years (median 50 years). The median follow- up was 18 months. Compared groups were balanced in all parameters. The advanced stage of disease (III-IV) at diagnosis had 66% patients treated with CHOP and 67,5 % patients treated with R-CHOP. =2 extranodal zones were initially revealed at 35% in CHOP group vs 47% in R- CHOP group. PS of 25 % patients in R-CHOP group and 30% patients in CHOP group was regarded as appropriate 3–4 degrees on ECOG. Increased LDH level was marked at 60% in CHOP-group vs 54% in R-CHOP. 29% patients in R-CHOP group and 21% patients in CHOP group had B-symptoms at diagnosis; bulky disease took place in 53% cases in R-CHOP group and 62% cases in CHOP. High IPI score had 47 % patients in CHOP-group vs 48 % in R-CHOP. Results: Complete response was achieved in 74% of the patients treated with R- CHOP, as compared to 56% of those treated with CHOP alone (p<0,05). Disease progression during treatment was reported in 25% of patients in CHOP group and 18,5% in R-CHOP group. Median overall survival in patients treated with R-CHOP was NS, in patients treated with CHOP alone was 16 months. With a median follow-up of 18 months, 29 (31,5%) events (progression - 18,5%, relapse - 10%, death - 3% ) were observed in the R-CHOP group and 48 (52%) events ( progression - 25%, relapse - 20%, death - 7%) in the CHOP group (p<0,05). Median event-free survival and relapse-free survival in the CHOP group was 12 months, in R-CHOP group NS. Toxicity was equivalent in both groups. Conclusions: We have established better direct efficiency and outcome of R-CHOP in any age of pts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.