Multilineage dysplasia per se is not an adverse prognostic factor in AML patients treated with the FLAG regimen. Favorable results are obtained in patients with intermediate karyotype, while in those with adverse cytogenetics new approaches are clearly needed. The toxicity of the regimen is also acceptable in the elderly, and following induction/consolidation, most patients may be submitted to transplantation procedures.

Summary.Immunophenotypic findings from 14 patients affected by acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with t(8;21) were compared to those obtained from 79 AML patients with normal or other aberrant karyotypes. Classic lineage markers, adhesion molecules, surface enzymes, stem-cellrelated antigens and HLA-DR were investigated. Following evaluation by the Mann-Whitney test, we found that t(8;21) AMLs showed a significantly higher expression of CD19, CD34, CD56, CD45RA and CD54. Conversely, blasts from patients in the control group significantly expressed higher levels of CD45R0, CD33, CD36, CD11b and CD14. In order to split the data at the best cut-off point to achieve the most homogenous subset with regard to cytogenetic pattern, i.e. t(8;21) or not, the CART (Classification and Regression Trees) method was applied. In the univariate analysis by CART, statistically significant differences were found when CD19 was dichotomized at 10%, CD34 at 37%, CD45RA at 84%, CD54 at 21%, CD56 at 12% , CD36 at 14%, CD45R0 at 25%, CD11b at 18% and CD14 at 12%. Once cut-off points were established by CART, we applied the logistic regression model to establish which combination of two or more antigens was most predictive for t(8;21). The combination CD19-CD34 at the cut-off points indicated above correctly classified 92/93 cases (98·9%). The addition of any other antigen combination to the CD19/CD34 model failed to improve the level of prediction. We conclude that AML with t(8;21) displays an exclusive immunophenotype that is highly predictive of the cytogenetic pattern.

Translocation t(8;21)(q22;q22) is a common karyotypic abnormality detected in about 15% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases. The rearrangement results in fusion of the RUNX1 (also known as AML1) and CBFA2T1 (also known as ETO) genes, generating a 5'RUNX1/3'CBFA2T1 transcriptionally active fusion gene on derivative chromosome 8, but some cases with ins(21;8) and ins(8;21) have been observed. However, a detailed breakpoint characterization of the insertion events has never been reported. In the present article, we describe six insertion events among 82 (7.3%) AML cases characterized by the RUNX1/CBFA2T1 fusion. Using FISH experiments with appropriate bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) and P1 artificial chromosome (PAC) probes, we were able to perform a detailed molecular cytogenetic characterization of one case with ins(8;21) and five with ins(21;8). Our analysis revealed that insertions generating the 5'RUNX1/3'CBFA2T1 gene showed variable breakpoints; the size of the inserted elements ranged from 2.4 to 44 Mb.

No abstract

No abstract