The purpose of this study was to determine the setting of norms about the Cyber ​​Notary system in Indonesia and Australia and to find out the differences and similarities in the Cyber ​​Notary regulatory system in both countries. This study uses a type of normative research; the theories used in this study are the theory of justice, the theory of legal certainty and comparative law theory. The approach method used is the conceptual approach, the legislative approach, and the comparative approach. Analysis of this study, using comparative analysis is to collect material according to the appropriate legal material about the problem being studied, and then compare it. Based on the results of the study that, the regulation of the norms regarding the Cyber ​​Notary system in Indonesia is in the Law, namely a. Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning changes to Law No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position. b. Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE Law), c. Law No 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, and for Australian Countries, how many Cyber ​​Notary Arrangements are explained in the 1999 / Electronic Electronic Transaction Act Transactions Act 1999 / ETA (Australia). The difference lies in Indonesia having its own rules in which there is clearly stated authority in carrying out the profession of notaries including in connection with the identification of transactions electronically (Cyber ​​Notary), while Australia does not have its own specific rules that explain explicitly the authority of notaries in serving Cyber ​​systems. Notary, because the service mechanism is part of the form of electronic transactions that are regulated in the 1999 Electronic Transaction Act / Electronic Transaction Act 1999 / ETA. The equation is seen in the Function, the Cyber ​​Notary System is equally a government regulation in the form of public servants quickly, concisely, and has the value of legal protection on all parties. in Indonesia with the Registration of Online Companies, through the Legal Entity Administration System or abbreviated as SABH, and in Australia with the e-apostille system. In terms of its objectives, namely the implementation of the Cyber ​​Notary system in the two countries, which are both aimed at raising the potential of the economy and trade inside and outside the country.

Children are Nation Assets who have limitations in understanding and protecting themselves from the various influences of the existing system, therefore protection efforts are needed. Research Objectives analyze the concept of the best interests of children in the juvenile criminal justice system, the application of the principle of best interest for children in sexual abuse cases in the Central Lombok Police Station. Empirical legal research methods. Results of research Setting the principle of best interest for children in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Judicial System in the provisions of Article 2 letter d. The application of the principle of best interest for children in the Central Lombok Resort Police, suspects are not treated the same as adults, given the opportunity to go to school, be examined in a special room that is a PPA unit room, a PPA special investigator and dressed non-official.

Negara  Indonesia merupakan Negara Hukum, sedangkan fungsi hukum dalam  negara hukum adalah sebagai “Social Control” (Pengendalian tingkah laku masyarakat), yang maksudnya hukum berfungsi untuk mengatur tingkah laku manusia dalam kehidupan  berbangsa dan bernegara, guna menciptakan suasana  yang tertib, teratur dan tenteram. Adapun tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaturan keterangan saksi (mahkota) dalam hukum acara pidana di Indonesia, untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis kategori keterangan saksi (mahkota) dalam praktik penegakkan  hukum tindak pidana pencurian. Pengaturan keterangan saksi (mahkota) dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia tidak diatur dalam ketentuan Pasal 184 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Kategori keterangan saksi (mahkota) dalam proses penegakkan hukum tindak pidana pencurian adalah saksi mahkota digunakan dalam hal terjadi penyertaan (deelneming), di mana terdakwa yang satu dijadikan saksi terhadap terdakwa lainnya oleh karena alat bukti yang lain tidak ada atau sangat minim, dan hal ini dimaksud untuk mempermudah pembuktian.Kata Kunci : Alat Bukti; Saksi Mahkota; Pidana Pencurian.

This paper discusses the accountability for violations that follow hoax coverage in Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions by apllying normative legal research methods. This article argues that a criminal offense in reporting hoax must be sanctioned in Article 28 of Law Number 11 Year 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. Therefore, the need to study Article 28 relates to other invitations regulations which are also related to the accountability of follow-up on the distribution of hoax.

In a comparative study of Eradicating Corruption in Indonesia and Japan appears that law culture plays a significant role. Indonesia has special institution that deals with corruption while Japan does not have it. Nevertheless, cases of corruption in Indonesia are higher than in Japan. This is due to the Indonesian culture of ewuh pakewuh, reluctant, and has two different views in dealing with corruption. On the one hand, Indonesia rejects corruption, but on the other hand, it commits actions that support corruption. Meanwhile, Japan has a strong culture of shame for committing law violations both at the community level and law enforcement officers.