PCS symptoms are not unique to MTBI, and may be seen in conditions such as CP.

The purposes of this study were: (1) to determine the prevalence of abnormal 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT scans in patients suffering from persistent post-concussive syndrome (PPCS) after mild closed head injury (CHI); (2) to compare SPECT with structural neuroimaging (MRI and CT) in patients with mild CHI; and (3) to investigate correlations between SPECT and clinical data obtained from the patient sample (neuropsychological testing, demographics, psychiatric diagnoses). Forty-three patients were included. SPECT was read as abnormal in 53% of patients and showed a total of 37 lesions while MRI was read as abnormal in 9% and CT scan in only 4.6% of patients after mild CHI. SPECT appears to be more sensitive in detecting cerebral abnormalities after mild CHI, especially in patients with PPCS symptoms, than either CT or MRI. No statistically significant relationship was found between SPECT scan abnormalities and age, past psychiatric history, history of substance abuse, or history of multiple CHI. Education level did not differ between patients with normal and abnormal SPECT. Current neuropsychiatric symptoms did not seem to have any impact on the results of SPECT scan.

Thirteen patients who experienced problems with irritability and aggression following closed head injury (CHI) participated in a non-blind, 8 week open trial and sertraline HCl. Significant reduction in irritability and aggressive outbursts was observed. No significant changes were observed in depressive symptomatology. Results suggest that serotonergic agents may be useful in treating aggression and irritability after head injury. Further placebo-controlled studies using serotonergic agents are indicated.

Clinical neuropsychological assessment frequently requires the comparison of obtained scores against some estimate of premorbid level of functioning, but only recently has significant attention been turned to objective methods to accomplish this objective. Clinical judgment, although useful in some circumstances, is generally insufficient. Other methods of estimating premorbid function include demographic regression formulae, such as the Barona formula, subtest scatter methods, such as that suggested by Lezak, and the use of current scores on tests of presumably spared abilities, such as the National Adult Reading Test (NART). Almost all methods predict to some general level of intellectual functioning rather than to specific neuropsychological skills. This paper reviews the suggested methods in terms of the underlying assumptions and the available empirical evidence. Suggestions for future research include the development of skill specific predictors as well as investigations regarding the relation between predictor accuracy and characteristics of the subject, such as high versus low premorbid functioning in the subject. Additionally, there is a great need for methods to predict premorbid functioning in children.