Purpose: To compare the impact of unilateral vs. bilateral age-related macular degeneration (AMD) on postural sway, and the influence of different visual conditions. The hypothesis of our study was that the impact of AMD will be different between unilateral and bilateral AMD subjects compared to age-matched healthy elderly.Methods: Postural stability was measured with a platform (TechnoConcept®) in 10 elderly unilateral AMD subjects (mean age: 71.1 ± 4.6 years), 10 elderly bilateral AMD subjects (mean age: 70.8 ± 6.1 years), and 10 healthy age-matched control subjects (mean age: 69.8 ± 6.3 years). Four visual conditions were tested: both eyes viewing condition (BEV), dominant eye viewing (DEV), non-dominant eye viewing (NDEV), and eyes closed (EC). We analyzed the surface area, the length, the mean speed, the anteroposterior (AP), and mediolateral (ML) displacement of the center of pressure (CoP).Results: Bilateral AMD subjects had a surface area (p < 0.05) and AP displacement of the CoP (p < 0.01) higher than healthy elderly. Unilateral AMD subjects had more AP displacement of the CoP (p < 0.05) than healthy elderly.Conclusions: We suggest that ADM subjects could have poor postural adaptive mechanisms leading to increase their postural instability. Further studies will aim to improve knowledge on such issue and to develop reeducation techniques in these patients.
The 3 IOLs models, including the blue light-filtering model, had similar anterior chamber cells and flare values over a 3-month period, showing the lack of difference in inflammation induced by cataract surgery with implantation of the 3 similar IOL models.
Objective: To compare the impact of unilateral versus bilateral Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) on saccadic movements, and to show the effect of visual search training on these eye movement performances in AMD subjects. We hypothesized that unilateral and bilateral AMD subjects had abnormal saccadic performances, and that visual search training could improve their performances. Methods: Three groups participated in visual search training: 13 elderly unilateral AMD subjects (mean age: 74.6 ± 1.6 years), 15 elderly bilateral AMD subjects (mean age: 74.2 ± 1.2 years), and 15 healthy age-matched control subjects (mean age: 70.9 ± 1.3 years). Horizontal saccadic performances were recorded before and after visual search training (Metrisquare®) with the Mobile Eye Tracker (Mobile EBT®). We analyzed the saccadic movement performances: latency, mean velocity and gain. We measured the training performances for each exercise: the time, the number of omissions and the number of errors. We analyzed the performances with Kruskal-Wallis and posthoc tests. Results: The latency of saccades in AMD subjects is significantly longer compared to healthy elderly for 15° (p<0.03), 10° (p<0.003) and 5° (p<10-3). Unilateral and bilateral AMD subjects normalized their latency of saccades after training for small saccades (respectively p=0.30 and p=0.23 for 10°, and p=0.09 and p=0.52 for 5°). In elderly, performances depend on the saccade’s amplitude. Conclusion: AMD subjects’ saccadic movements are disrupted: the execution needs more time but is efficient. The visual search training improved the saccadic performances in AMD subjects. Further studies will aim to improve knowledge on such issues and to explore the benefit of training over time in unilateral AMD subjects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.